# Christoph Mende ange...@gentoo.org (09 Apr 2013)
# Fails to build (bug #449860), abandoned by upstream.
# Removal in 30 days.
mail-client/postler
Hi all,
since I don't own a Samsung laptop anymore and my new laptop has Intel
graphics, I'd like to drop maintainership of the following packages:
app-laptop/easy-slow-down-manager (belongs to samsung-tools)
app-laptop/nvidiabl
app-laptop/samsung-tools
net-wireless/ndiswrapper
They're all
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage
Hi,
I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for
someone to take over a few, most notably:
- net-misc/curl
- net-dns/c-ares (preferably both together)
And while we're at it there's also some lower maintenance packages I'd
like to get rid of just because I don't use them
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 11:22 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I would say that each package needs to have at least one herd or
maintainer (which may be maintainer-needed or maintainer-wanted).
Well, you can easily assign your packages to dozen
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:48:09 -0400
Dmitry Goncharov dgoncha...@users.sf.net wrote:
Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support
for the sun, ibm, hp and intel
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 18:06 +0200, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 17:08 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
net-misc/curl
I'll take one of those
And net-dns/c-ares too.
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 17:08 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
net-misc/curl
I'll take one of those
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
- gpg control packet
All,
[..]
Thanks!
[1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
Hi Dane,
I
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 19:18 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:47 μμ, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:19
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 16:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need
to specify the version.
Thank you, but it's still
Hi,
this is just a quick heads up, because nirbheek forced me to do it.
GNOME 2.0 slot deps should be fixed after about 1,000 commits and the tree is
good to go for GNOME
3.0. Everyone adding non-slot deps on gtk+ or GNOME libs will be
stabbed.
Thank you for your attention.
signature.asc
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:57 +0200, Thomas Kahle wrote:
On 13:13 Sun 27 Mar , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
FEATURES=digest results in a scary warning and a possibly dangerous
re-generation of manifests at the beginning of every emerge:
* The FEATURES=digest setting can prevent corruption
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 13:03 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:57 +0200, Thomas Kahle wrote:
On 13:13 Sun 27 Mar , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
FEATURES=digest results in a scary warning and a possibly dangerous
# Christoph Mende ange...@gentoo.org (26 Mar 2011)
# Unmaintained upstream and replaced by media-plugins/gmpc-libnotify
# and gmpc's built in notifications.
# Will be removed in 30 days.
media-plugins/gmpc-osd
media-plugins/gmpc-qosd
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 10:55 +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Thomas Kahle dixit (2011-03-25, 10:47):
it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that
the validity should be 6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry
date is approaching?
“After size comes the
Hi,
this should make mono.eclass EAPI3 compatible, please review the
attached patch before I commit it, so you can throw your stones before
it appears on gentoo-commits. Thanks.
Index: mono.eclass
===
RCS file:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:48 +0100, Christoph Mende wrote:
Hi,
this should make mono.eclass EAPI3 compatible, please review the
attached patch before I commit it, so you can throw your stones before
it appears on gentoo-commits. Thanks.
Tiny update to the patch:
24/235024 @ABCD I would set
Hi,
I want to drop maintainership for these packages because I don't use
them anymore. They all are low maintenance, most haven't had releases
in over a year.
If you are interested in any of those, feel free to remove me from metadata.xml:
app-editors/hexedit
app-misc/granule
app-misc/tdfsb
# Christoph Mende ange...@gentoo.org (22 Feb 2011)
# Masked for removal, inotify support has been in tail -f since coreutils-7.5
sys-apps/inotail
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's nothing usable left in tree, it's bitrotted for too long.
will be masked for removal in 30 days if nobody wants to pick it up.
Well, I'm not using it, but I'd hate to see it go since I remember how
I was
be annoying when doing euse -i some flag and
getting over 9000 hits, so let's remove the always
--
Christoph Mende
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering
GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for my eclass (was thinking of something
like xfce4-r1.eclass, which I don't really like though) or can I just
overwrite the old eclass?
--
Christoph Mende
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering
GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:25 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Mende wrote:
Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:59:42 +0200
cilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:53 PM, cilly wrote:
Additional:
Sometimes the chance for the users to place the ebuild comfortably
into overlay is simply taken, since the ebuild has been removed and
doesn't exist after a sync
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:11:54 +0300
Aggelos Orfanakos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:19:28 +0300 Christian Heim wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Christoph Mende (also known as angelos
on
IRC), our latest addition joining the AMD64 and XFCE herd.
Hiya angelos
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:26:08 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this license now.
Hmm, it was sent to both lists, looks intended to me, besides that,
here's a snippet from the original email:
Feel
free to share
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:13:24 +
Catalin Zamfir Alexandru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how are we going to connect to PPP after the removal? I'm using the 2.6
kernel, but stil use /usr/sbin/pppoe-start
Well?
[N] net-dialup/rp-pppoe (3.8-r1): A user-mode PPPoE client and server
suite for
You could release the new version under the old name as a meta package
that installs the package with the new name
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:53 +0400, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
Hello.
One of packages I maintain changed its name. What shall be done, so
users of the package were aware about
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 07:37 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
is evdev (for 7.1) stable now? and by stable I mean can I use it
without it crashing xorg? I should probably test this because I don't
recall it getting updated which means it is still broken.
I was running evdev under Xorg 7.0 and 7.1
No game I've installed here needs any package with the oss USE flag, those packages that use OSS are fine the ALSA OSS Emulation.2006/9/24, Ryan Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Mike Frysinger wrote: oss is dead, why bother going with it in default USE anymore ?alsa forever !
i think the standard argument
Well ok, I don't use alsa-driver ;)2006/9/24, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 24 September 2006 00:13, Christoph Mende wrote: No game I've installed here needs any package with the oss USE flag, those packages that use OSS are fine the ALSA OSS Emulation.That requires oss
33 matches
Mail list logo
