/electricsheep
x11-plugins/wmium
Thanks for taking them
I'll take net-misc/curl
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/11 07:40, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/08/2011 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote:
All,
In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to
have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has'
respectively?
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry for the extra spam. I was missing the link:
[1]
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/function-reference/query-functions/index.html
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks
. (And help provide a logical transition from Sunrise to
Portage).
Well, that about covers it. What does everyone think? Good idea? Bad
idea? Waste of time? Are you crazy? Let's hear it!
Thanks!
[1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
- gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/11 12:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22/06/2011 07:30 ¼¼, Dane Smith wrote:
On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
!
[1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=summary
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux
Januszewski
http://people.gentoo.org/spock
Hello Anthoine,
Please take a look at [1]. I would be more than glad to help you adopt
those. Contact me off list and we can work out the details.
[1]http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith
to 5.11.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
should have the ability to pick their candidates to go to
council, and maybe just give Council the vote on who gets it. Or, have
council appoint people they think are fit, and the team can vote from
there. Either way I think would work alright.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher
or undesirable? Can you really not spare the
extra 10 seconds? I mean, come on.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/11 17:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's
far too
him to version things more... sanely? I've had to do that a
few times and people are usually surprisingly receptive.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP
opinion.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
major weakness with the cipher.
The only thing I don't personally really love about it is the lack of
analysis. Something like AES has been the majority of the fields notice
and gets more attention, so it is likely better analyzed and understood.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux
of OpenSSL in use is not. He's
not referring to the cipher talk, but to the version information as far
as I can tell.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2011 12:01 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 04/26/2011 07:17 PM, Dane Smith (c1pher) wrote:
c1pher 11/04/27 00:17:00
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Log:
app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror: Updated maintainer info
that
license to package.license?
@Trustees: Any thoughts? I didn't mean to step on any toes, I just
hadn't spotted that old bug until today.
Regards,
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241650
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dane Smith c1p...@gentoo.org wrote:
@Trustees: Any thoughts? I didn't mean to step on any toes, I just
hadn't spotted that old bug until today.
So, speaking only
a big proponent of *not* using -j1 unless it is 100%
necessary. Fix the Makefile. Don't just take the shortcut. There is a
tracker for that here [1].
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351559
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key
be all, I somehow doubt it.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
adequate.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
or not my name is Dane Smith is a moot point. All that matters is that I
am the person that the Gentoo recruiters granted access to.
I cannot stress how important some of this is. It's bad if a binary
distro doesn't sign their code, but in some ways it's even worse for us.
An ebuild can do most anything
.
But for the meantime, yes, it's safe.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
that requires funding.
+1
We do not need to get paid for X509 certs. We control portage. We
control the manifests. We do not need some third party CA to control the
certs used for signing. We have the infrastructure to do it ourselves.
For free. With us in control of the revocation etc.
- --
Dane
tampered with.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
repoman should already be part of that workflow.
Secondly, I like that last idea. Except I'd amend that it should run
repoman full; warn if anything is wrong, then repoman manifest etc.
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371
it for the
duration of the session. I don't know how feasible it is to do, but if
normal viewing (no login) can be left SSL free, I see no issue there.
Otherwise however, SSL should be in use.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu
teams day to day
activities. As long as a team is in line with its mission and isn't
causing any problems, they should be left alone. If they begin to cause
issues, then it is time for discussion.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Dane Smith c1p...@gentoo.org (19 Jan 2011)
# On behalf of the QA team
#
# Packages below fail to build with
# =sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.35 and block its
# stabilization. Bugs untouched in over 3 months.
# Masking for removal on 21 Mar 2011
/python-wpactrl
net-misc/wicd
-Jeremy
Thomas,
I'm willing to help out too if you can use the extra set of hands. Let
me know if you'd like the help and I'll add myself as a maintainer as well.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http
policy could safely be done away with.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531op=index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2010 02:29 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Kacper Kowalik schrieb am 08.11.2010 19:30:
app-crypt/steghide
Adopted by me.
Done.
Thanks!
- --
Dane Smith
Gentoo Linux Developer -- Crypto and x86 Teams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/13/10 02:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Dane Smith wrote:
I would like to add the license for truecrypt-7.0 to Portage. Link
is here http://www.truecrypt.org/legal/license
It says TrueCrypt License Version 3.0 not 7.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/13/2010 02:47 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Dane Smith wrote:
I would like to add the license for truecrypt-7.0 to Portage. Link
is here http://www.truecrypt.org/legal/license
It says TrueCrypt License Version 3.0
36 matches
Mail list logo
