In light of the dnssec root key signing there is the issue of how to get this
into default installs of operating systems. A number of programs that are
DNSSEC aware will need access to the dnssec root key. I see this has the same
problem that app-misc/ca-certificates solved and a
On Sunday 13 December 2009 22:44:05 Daniel Black wrote:
Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing
CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us).
https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.h
tml
This is still in draft hasn't been
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 23:19:22 Richard Freeman wrote:
On 12/15/2009 01:46 AM, Daniel Black wrote:
I did email the debian maintainer too. no response yet. They have
interactive builds though and I guess we do too now. Will be a royal pain
if every CA/software did the same thing
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 07:10:25 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is entirely moot. The CACert materials in Gentoo come from Debian's
ca-certificates package. We do NOT independently supply them.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/ca-certificates
I think this might enable us to entirely
Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing
CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us).
https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.html
This is still in draft hasn't been discussed in CAcert's policy group yet.
If you want to
And thankyou for all the fish you've given.
http://cia.vc/stats/author/corsair
You've done a pretty good job of making Gentoo great especially for ppc64.
Good luck with whatever you do next.
cited reply on the bug report.
Next step? Gentoo Foundation lawyers?
Sorry for the lack of interest especially to all those who want to use
truecrypt in the time being.
Daniel Black
I'm not sure I want to see this list being a QA list for commits.
If there is a commit that raises an interesting question for everyone sure put
it here.
Otherwise please take up QA faults with the author or devrel if you think they
are consistantly under-standard.
just my 2c.
--
Daniel
TPM support has been in the linux kernel for a while.
The current version doesn't build and is probably outdated (bug #249291).
app-crypt/tpm-module will be removed before February 2009.
--
Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Foundation
Thanks for all your great work over the years.
Much appreciated.
Best wishes for whatever you end up doing.
--
Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Foundation
.
In the solitude of effectively a one person herd, and i'm largely to blame,
you've done exceptionally well. I'm note sure I could of coped as long.
I'm hoping at the end of such a dedicated time you have had some fun.
Keep well in whatever you do next.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:51:59 am Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Daniel Black (dragonheart) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+ 01 Apr 2008; Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] use.mask:
+ mask ssh2 as net-libs/libssh2 does not have keywords yet
How likely is it that libssh2 is anytime soon keyworded
] package.
Small amounts of this can be done on bug reports.
Get involved with overlay projects like sunrise to increase the usages of
packages you like. Maybe oneday you'll even become a gentoo developer and can
make a package mainstream.
Oleg.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
[2]
These are still available in the xeffects overlay for those who want them [3].
[1] http://www.xiaprojects.com/www/prodotti/kxdocker/main.php?action=download
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124159#c3
[3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/userguide.xml
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL
maintainer
to defend it.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpXArHLtFMkt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it. (see End User
License Agreement.)
http://www.jetico.com/index.htm#/linux.htm (Additional Notes)
Is there a need for official policy here (and a bit of package removals)?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpfekwYzQnoB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Subject: Re: afflib licence
Date: Wednesday 07 February 2007 09:56
From: Simson Garfinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brian Carrier [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Daniel. Thanks for your email. We'd be happy to have you add
AFFLIB to the Gentoo
.
I assume you have set your USE flags to include the appropriate dependencies
and/or emerged the dependencies already.
- implement warn_config (though I don't think its really needed)
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpmidpUiJ7NI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wondering if the religion herd would kindly see over the last rites of
packages on their journey into oblivion?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpJiNMiFzyiY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:48, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007, Daniel Black wrote:
Also creates the following symlinks to it
i dont see much value in these symlinks ... what do they gain us ?
An easy way to find the closest config when merging a revision/version
On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:55, Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:21:01PM +1100, Daniel Black wrote:
Fellow devs,
WARN_CONFIG
warn_config (useflags)
warns the user that the useflags have been overridden by savedconfig
Anything else?
overriding use flags
Please welcome Martin as a new fellow developer among us !
Welcome to Gentoo and netmon in particular.
May your free time be filled with many solved bug reports, version bumps, and
better integration activities.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpdhj1tgAqwk.pgp
on IRC.
The good thing about the Gentoo community is there is so many mediums to
harass you. Its all about choice after all.
So please welcome Dean as a new fellow developer among us !
Welcome.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgppr2IEnyiqK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
February 2007, Daniel Black wrote:
The savedconfig configuration control does NOT aim to:
- replace the USE flag determination of dependencies
It will be possible to configure an option that conflicts with a USE flag in
some cases. Given the grief that would be caused by trying to determine
the config files are restored in the same order
listed in save_config with the -s.
WARN_CONFIG
warn_config (useflags)
warns the user that the useflags have been overridden by savedconfig
Anything else?
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpekacYAqKrP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
digest good - assuming it was xdelta generated
(more fetching)
unpacking
.
I'm thinking xdeltas that gets generated on the staging server and some portage
support so facilitate a minimal download.
Note: i haven't looked at previous xdelta portage patches from years ago.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL
working towards a smooth transition and this has
occurred really smoothly (as far as I have seen).
I've noticed the usage of bugs.gentoo.org is now, dare i say it,
pleasureable :-).
Thankyou again GNI for your hardware.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpGh0CCsOUk5.pgp
Welcome Alon,
Pleasure to have you on board.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
will be required for packages
that link against gnutls (and libtasn1) to work.
If any package fails to build against the newer gnutls please file a bug at
bugs.gentoo.org.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 21:35, Daniel Black wrote:
As reported
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147800 gnutls-1.4.4 links itself
against an existing gnutls-1.2* version if installed. I haven't been able
to find the cause of this.
Bug fixed in gnutls-1.4.4-r1.
Testers still
On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:42, Daniel Black wrote:
I've added new versions of these libs to gentoo. They are currently in
package.mask because I've missed a few bumps versions in between and there
is an ABI change. Some old deprecated functions have been removed.
So far these have been
Hope so - don't want rumors that Gentoo kills relationships.
Yes, that would be bad.. and may make the need for date-a-dev even more
apparant.. And we don't want that. (There is no way I'm letting antarus
and ChrisWhite win..)
Adopt a Developer needs developer requests?
--
Daniel Black
-misc/snitch
net-libs/roadrunner
sys-fs/cowloop
net-ftp/pftpfxp
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/Forensics/NetMon
pgpZd6ijNah9Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in this manner.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/Forensics/NetMon
pgp2RuDS8uZqg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060724-newsletter.xml#doc_chap1_sect2
[2] http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200607-09.xml
[3] http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-cvs/200605
[4] http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html#q1.2
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 01:16, Graham Murray wrote:
Is there an equivalent of (or replacement for) the command line
tethereal?
tshark
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpj1Ot1BfcHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
36 matches
Mail list logo
