.
This seems like a package that is easy to maintain, and since the
security bug is easily dealt with by a version bump and stabilization, I
guess text-markup absorbs it.
Martin Ehmsen
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
but making the tree it self.
So if you feel like figuring out which tex packages should go into which
of the three trees then I would appreciate it very much! (remember that
there are also deps between the packages).
Martin Ehmsen
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
packages that goes into the texmf trees.
And some of the bigger packages (beamer,...) should _not_ be in the
texmf trees, since we want to be able to upgrade those without making a
new release of the temxf trees (which forces users to download a large
file again).
Martin Ehmsen
--
gentoo-dev
of our own
TeX distribution).
Comments, suggestions, offers of help, anything would be useful :)
Martin Ehmsen
1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general/1226
2: http://www.tug.org/texlive
3: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124511
4. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94815
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 06:44, Mike Frysinger wrote:
or because reading GLEP 42 is boooring
s/42 /s/
Syntax error!
s/ 42/s/
instead.
/Ehmsen
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:01, Martin Ehmsen wrote:
Syntax error!
More than syntax is me who was sleeping.
I just meant that it gave a syntax error
(after applying your sed)
Although I suppose this means we all agree ;)
Definitely!
Maybe we should propose
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata/herd info and CC yourself on the bug.
I seems that the text-markup team could absorb this package (seems very
related).
If no one objects to this, I'll add it to the text-markup
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:07 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
So, from a developer pov Ciaran; if we could come up with some way of
keeping up to date with what you guys do (without eating up any of your
time or getting in your way) and then keep the masses informed, would
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
Another thing that some people may not have considered - with many
developers using various permutations of overlays, how can you
guarantee that what is being checked into the main tree will build for
a normal user? In order to test that, a developer would have to
?)
--
Martin Ehmsen
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Alec Warner wrote:
Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours.
It would probably be easier if you added the maintainer of each package
to the list (it shouldn't be that difficult, but I'm not volunteering :-P).
/Martin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
