On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 06:12:06 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> At the top, I noted that it will be possible in future for AI generation
> to be used in a good, safe way, and we should provide some signals to
> the researchers behind the AI industry on this matter.
>
> What should it have?
> -
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 15:45:17 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 22:39:13 +, Lucio Sauer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan wrote:
> > Previously sys-kernel/installkernel was implicitly installed on many systems
> > via a dependency in sys-apps/debianutils. This dependency was toggled
> > by the
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 20:01:49 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> ### Notes: Tried to keep this news item as concise as possible,
> ### more information in #920527.
>
>
> Title: LXD to lose access for its image server
> Author: Joonas Niilola
> Posted: 2023-12-28
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 06:42:35 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Make the `native-extensions` flag global. It is used in 15 Python
> packages to enable building optional C extensions, though the global
> description also allows for other "native" and "pure" languages.
>
> In 9 cases, the flag
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 14:03:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Jonas Stein wrote:
>
> >> # Removal on 2023-10-21. Bug #667687, #667689.
>
> > We should use "after" instead of "on":
>
> > # Removal after T
>
> I wonder if we even need to specify the wording in such
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 22:40:05 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> = "Formal" format =
>
> Each entry is composed of 2 parts: "#"-prefixed explanation block and
> list of "${CATEGORY}/${PN}" packages. Entries are separated when a new
> explanation block starts (meaning first "#"-prefixed
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 23:22:27 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>
> > = "Formal" format =
>
> > Each entry is composed of 2 parts: "#"-prefixed explanation block and
> > list of "${CATEGORY}/${PN}" packages. Entries are separated when a
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:10:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
> >
> > And then another thing, how is it possible that so many people missed
> > the news item? They are displayed quite prominently I think, and
> > emerge will keep buggering you about it until it is marked as read.
>
Update the description and example to use the new sec-keys/ category
instead of the old app-crypt/ for openpgp-keys-* packages.
Signed-off-by: Oskari Pirhonen
---
GH PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/32111
eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 19:39:30 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 16.50, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:04 PM Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> >> Now I'll speak from the point of implementer of `pkgdev bugs`. For me I
> >> think both approaches are good, but I would prefer
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 20:40:34 +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2023, 01:09:30 CEST schrieb Oskari Pirhonen:
> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 21:56:26 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 12:44:39PM +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 21:56:26 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 12:44:39PM +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> > just to be curious about the whole discussion. I did not follow in the
> > deepest detail but what I got is:
> > - EGO_SUM blows up the Manifest file, since every
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 20:52:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I think a better approach would be to always include $? in die messages
> in Portage.
>
I'm not sure the exit code is useful in the general case. Something like
rm(1) seems to give the same exit code despite failing for different
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 21:30:49 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2023-05-30 17:52, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > To prevent harm from Gentoo, we should reach an agreement that everyone
> > can live with. To achieve a consensus, and since I can not rule out that
> > I missed a post
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:19:48 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 00:03 -0500, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> > We agreed that it could potentially be useful as something that's
> > available for general use
>
> We generally don't add something into EAPI unles
Hi,
Matt recently made a PR to a QA check script in Portage [1] which
included the following function:
is_in() {
local needle=$1
shift
local x
for x in "$@"; do
[[ "${needle}" = ${x} ]] && return 0
done
return 1
}
It's more or
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 20:25:46 +, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> Am 11.02.2023 19:58:27, "Jonas Stein" schrieb:
>
> >https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-misc/physlock
> >
>
> I suspect, that this could be last-rited, as upstream marked repo as
> read-only on Github.
>
I actively use
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 12:40:12 -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> In the event that the linux src tree does not have
> a valid .config, check for /proc/config.gz
>
What about checking /boot/config-[version] as a backup as well? Since
the standard `make install` for the kernel drops the config used to
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 14:35:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Friends,
>
> Our dear friend zlogene has been inactive recently, and for this reason
> the packages listed below are looking for new maintainers. Please take
> a look and see if you're interested in a few of them.
>
> ...
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:26:15 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> I _believe_ ago's tinderbox isn't being paid by the GF _anymore_ due to
> this reason, but he keeps it running with his own expenses. I don't mind
> this as long as the results are desirable and not phony. I still see a
> lot of value
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually
> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you
> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ...
> closedsource and
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 06:49:17 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/dist-kernel-utils.eclass | 16
> eclass/tests/dist-kernel-utils.sh | 28
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:49:49 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we've passed the threshold for making two USE flags global:
>
> - sound notification support (usually via libcanberra)
>
> - global hotkey support (usually via keybinder)
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on flag
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 01:43:19 +0200, Zoltan Puskas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on adding a go based ebuild to Gentoo yesterday and I
> got this warning form portage saying that EGO_SUM is deprecated and
> should be avoided. Since I remember there was an intense discussion
> about
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 14:42:55 -0500, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 16:46:33 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> > +# Where possible, it is also good to consider if using patches is more
> > +# suitable to ensure adequate changes. These functions are also unsafe
&g
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 16:46:33 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens
> ---
> eclass/esed.eclass | 265 +
> 1 file changed, 265 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 eclass/esed.eclass
>
> diff --git a/eclass/esed.eclass
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:36:46AM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> ... snip ...
>
> + # Roughly attempt to find files in arguments by checking if it's a
> + # readable file (aka s/// is not a file) and does not start with -
> + # (unless after --), then store contents for comparing after
Hi,
After updating my system and running `eclean-dist --deep`, I noticed the
following output:
The following unavailable installed packages were found
sys-apps/firejail-0.9.64.4
Was removing the stable version of sys-apps/firejail intentional? The
ebuild commit message says
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 08:57:26PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> So, let's make that number go down further fast! :D Cheers!
What is the best way to help with that? Should I just grep for "EAPI=5"
in /var/db/repos/gentoo and submit a pr with an updated ebuild? Is the
new target EAPI 8?
-
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:34:09AM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> If you'd like we'd prefer a GitHub pull request where you modify the
> ebuild adding this patch, and revbump the ebuild to -r2.
Sure, I can do that. It should be relativiely straightforward since I
already have the patch ready.
Hi,
I sent a pull request to upstream earlier this year to fix a PAM related
issue (see also: Gentoo bug #774729), but the repo has since been
archived [1]. Looking at the commit history, I see that there's only
been a single upstream commit since the beginning of 2020.
What is the proper
32 matches
Mail list logo
