Hello.
I found the following bug in debian bugzilla:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386570
Is this an issue for gentoo? Should I repackage tarball(/convince
upstream to repackage) and exclude this icons sounds from tarball? Or
may be RESTRICT fetch it enough to solve the
Hello.
Anatoly raised really important concern and currently I've started to
think about fix. One possible solution requires virtual/editor to suite
glep 37 and thus affects many packages. So... wondering why this change
was not done I'd like to discuss the problem on the list.
Problem:
There
On 2006-11-12 at 04:34 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
Considering that this is the only situation where environment is
dropped... yes this fixes sudo problem. The other possible solution is:
#!/bin/bash
export
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
then we end up with having to maintain a list of safe EDITORs and
dealing with people who want to edit their own favorite editor
the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not tell
people to change their sudo config file
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
in the example usages you cited, people where using `sudo` to just
avoid running `su -` first ... in other words, their sudo was
unlimited ... updating the sudoers file to allow EDITOR via env_keep
would work fine for them
in that
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 11:06 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
You can set `Defaults env_keep=EDITOR` in your sudoers file if you
want, or what I do is `Defaults:%wheel !env_reset`, to allow users in
group wheel to use sudo without the environment being scrubbed.
Of course I know about that. And I
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 12:15 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
The only `hardcoded` editor is the fallback editor for
visudo
And this is the problem I'm talking about. I do not see any reasons to
keep this not working fallback. There are parts of code that just do not
work in Gentoo.
which can be
On behalf of Russian translators team members I'd like to say thank you
for your work guys! This greatly simplifies translators work to
translate and keep translations updated. This also allows to create
Russian website synchronized with gentoo.org also with Russian specific
additions.
Thank you
On 2006-11-10 at 12:24 +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
It's app-admin/sudo and sys-process/fcron.
This packages use virtual/editor but by default set nano as default
editor.
I'm don't know how get provider category virtual/editor. But equery
view it as first package.
Any ideas ?
Please,
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld -o wepattack wepattack.o rc4.o wepfilter.o
log.o modes.o misc.o
On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current
get from eclasses.
Why? I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and
RDEPEND from eclass.
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hello.
One of packages I maintain changed its name. What shall be done, so
users of the package were aware about package name change and upgraded
flawlessly?
Thank you,
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2006-09-11 at 20:30 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if the
existing
file has identical content to the file to be installed, the file to be
installed
is installed as normal.
Just one poor
On Вск, 2006-06-11 at 02:16 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:11:50 +0200
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Localization of Gentoo-developed applications (portage,
gentoolkit,...) including their manpages
I don't really like this one. Documentation, sure, but for the
On Чтв, 2006-06-08 at 21:20 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
It's not a normal overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an
official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion.
IMO such overlay should be official! Why not to keep all (partially)
broken ebuilds in one place? This is the
On Чтв, 2006-06-08 at 21:20 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
It's not a normal overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an
official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion.
IMO such overlay should be official! Why not to keep all (partially)
broken ebuilds in one place? This is the
On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick way
for such things?
Peter.
On Срд, 2006-01-25 at 20:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
Are there any objections to removing csh from the tree? If there are no
problems with csh removal before Feb 1st 2006, then I will starting from
that date work on getting csh removed by masking it, blocking tcsh and
csh, and request for
On Вск, 2006-01-01 at 21:35 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
We have currently 10371 ChangeLog files, 25 MB totally .
1365 == 13% with size = 4096 B, 12 MB totally
rsync from emerge --sync has --whole-file between its options, that
mean transfer the whole file if changed.
2) rotate
19 matches
Mail list logo
