[gentoo-dev] x11-libs/lib*: wrong RDEPENDs bug

2009-12-28 Thread lxnay
In the aim of improving binpkgs status, I filed a bunch of bugs against all the libX* available in tree that contain wrong RDEPEND bits pointing to x11-proto/* stuff. To x11, just don't get angry (eheh), let's discuss concerns here (actually I don't see any and I am willing to fix all the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-26 Thread lxnay
So, :: vs @ apart, is it something that is worth looking and implementing in future EAPIs? -- Fabio Erculiani signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages

2009-05-26 Thread lxnay
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Philipp Riegger li...@anderedomain.de wrote: Hi Duncan, And all this layer thing Fabio was talking about. I did not try it and I did not read the code, but I think it makes things much more complicated. See also the discussion about mixing package managers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages

2009-05-26 Thread lxnay
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Philipp Riegger li...@anderedomain.de wrote: See also the discussion about mixing package managers between Gentoo and Sabayon. I do not want these problems.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-25 Thread lxnay
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 20:04 +0200 schrieb lx...@sabayonlinux.org: And then it's a pm thing. So the person you want to talk about it is zmedico. And zmedico told me to start discussing here. -- Tiziano Müller

Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages

2009-05-25 Thread lxnay
This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage = Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and apidocs. http://gitweb.sabayon.org/?p=entropy.git;a=summary -- Fabio Erculiani signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-25 Thread lxnay
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote: On So, 2009-05-24 at 20:04 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: [...] app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of a package from a

Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages

2009-05-25 Thread lxnay
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage = Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and apidocs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages

2009-05-25 Thread lxnay
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage = Entropy. I'm

[gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-24 Thread lxnay
Hi there, app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of a package from a specific repository. Users of multiple repositories seem to appreciate the freedom that is brought with this small-but-effective(TM)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-24 Thread lxnay
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, 24 May 2009 19:04:08 +0200 (CEST) lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of