On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:01:13 -0400
Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> On 24/04/01 08:40AM, orbea wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400
> > Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > > > Eli Schwartz wrote
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400
Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities,
> > >> you could forgive a paranoid
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:02:25 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm
> > saying is wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives
> > to choose from? That doesn't have to be
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 03:07:13 -
"Eddie Chapman" wrote:
> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities, you
> could forgive a paranoid person for seriously considering getting rid
> entirely of them from their systems, especially since there are
> suitable alternatives
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:38:49 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following packages are also left with no maintainer:
>
> x11-misc/dmenu
> x11-misc/slock
> x11-terms/yeahconsole
>
I use these and am willing to maintain them, but I don't think they
really need any changes either.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:56:55 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/9/24 4:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > This is the part where you try to convince me that the things I want
> > are stupid. OK. I don't care. I want it off. Leave me alone :)
>
>
> As evidenced by the removal of libressl and
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:43:13 -0800
orbea wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:25 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 06:13 -0800, orbea wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> &
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:25 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 06:13 -0800, orbea wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 19:32 -0800, orbea wrote:
> > > > This is
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 19:32 -0800, orbea wrote:
> > This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a
> > Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S}
> >
> > Signed-off-by: orbea
> >
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:06:35 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 1/22/24 10:32 PM, orbea wrote:
> > This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a
> > Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S}
> >
> > Signed-off-by: orbea
> > ---
>
This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a
Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S}
Signed-off-by: orbea
---
eclass/cargo.eclass | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cargo.eclass b/eclass/cargo.eclass
index 3bdbb5e3ec64
Hi,
Looking in the ::gentoo repo I noticed there are 3 different /usr/bin/nc
options available, net-analyzer/netcat, net-analyzer/openbsd-netcat and
net-analyzer/nmap[symlink].
And packages that depend on net-analyzer/netcat must also explicitly
list all of the available options where
On Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:20:25 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Yuan Liao (Leo3418) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 13:25:20 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2023-09-17 15:32:46, Marc Joliet wrote:
> > I just want to say how amazed I am that you (and Arsen, too) still
> > have the patience to try and explain the realities of the situation
> > like this, especially after the eudev thread.
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 12:58:00 +0200
Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Alexe Stefan writes:
>
> > One is written in shell, the other is written in c.(no problems
> > here)
>
> Not that implementation language matters.
>
> > One is not part of systemd, the other is.
>
> Both work fine without
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200
Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> "Eddie Chapman" writes:
>
> > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made
> > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it
> > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 19:38:27 +0100
Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> 15.09.2023 16:10, orbea пишет:
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200
> > Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> >
> >> "Eddie Chapman" writes:
> >>
> >>> Not aiming this at you pe
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200
Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> "Eddie Chapman" writes:
>
> > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made
> > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it
> > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:06:32 +0100
"Eddie Chapman" wrote:
> orbea wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:23:49 +0300
> > Alexe Stefan wrote:
> >
> >> All this makes me wonder, what really is the reason for this
> >> shitshow. Something tells me
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:51:34 -0400
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:35 AM orbea wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:17:00 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> > > Rich Freeman writes:
> > >
> > > > On
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:23:49 +0300
Alexe Stefan wrote:
> All this makes me wonder, what really is the reason for this shitshow.
> Something tells me systemd and it's shims will never be without a
> maintainer, regardless of how "popular" they are among gentoo folks.
> All this seems like
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:17:00 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> Rich Freeman writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 9:36 AM Eddie Chapman
> > wrote:
> >> in Gentoo. Have any of these 4 maintainers publicly said
> >> (anywhere) that they are not interested in being maintainers
> >> anymore (which is
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 23:17:09 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:50:13 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> >> orbea writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100
>
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:50:13 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> >> orbea writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100
> >> > Sam James wr
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> >> Dale writes:
> >>
> >> > orbea wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> Dale writes:
>
> > orbea wrote:
> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200
> >> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 CE
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:40:27 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:21:43 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:11 PM orbea wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:21:43 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:11 PM orbea wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> > > orbea writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100
> > Sam James wrote:
> >
> >> orbea writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Several months ago I made
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> orbea writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the
> > games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of minimal
> > emulators for the comman
Hi,
Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the
games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of minimal
emulators for the command-line games-emulation/jgrf frontend with a
focus on accuracy.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/891201
Upstream is very interested in any portability
sage ---
> On Monday, September 11th, 2023 at 5:42 PM, orbea
> wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200
> > "Andreas K. Huettel" dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
> >
> > > Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 CEST schrieb orb
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 CEST schrieb orbea:
>
> > Upstream is maintained still.
> >
> > https://github.com/eudev-project/eudev
> >
>
> No, it's not.
>
&g
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:14:21 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> # Andreas K. Hüttel (2023-09-11)
> # Dead project accumulating open bugs and incompatibilities.
> # No maintainer commits since February 2021.
> # Bugs 673834, 713106, 753134, 667686, 771705, 668880, 770358, 851255,
> # 711462,
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:59:59 -0400
Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> Noticed that the following packages have been dropped to m-n
> back on August 9 2023, but no mail been sent:
>
> acct-group/maradns
> acct-user/duende
> acct-user/maradns
> app-admin/ryzen_monitor
> app-admin/ryzen_smu
>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:37:10 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Joonas Niilola
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Another big issue is as mjo pointed out, not everyone uses GH.
> >
>
> "Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it
> has a bug attachment.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:10:36 +0300
Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
> > includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since
> > 2021.
>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:19:29 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 07:07 -0700, orbea wrote:
> >
> > Why does Gentoo lets PRs indefinitely sit around and collect dust?
> > Its extremely discouraging for contributors if their work just gets
> > igno
Hi,
Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021.
While not trying to be rude before contributing to Gentoo I was involved
with Slackbuilds.org for Slackware where everything gets reviewed once
a week with
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:23:38 +0200
Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 2023/06/17 10:12, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > After migrating to Wayland I no longer have a need for these X
> > packages. I have already removed myself as maintainer.
> >
> > x11-misc/xautolock
> >
> > Has one open bug that
On Sun, 21 May 2023 22:48:50 +0100
Sam James wrote:
> Ionen pointed this out again today and it made me look back at it;
> there's no reason to not have vulkan on by default for desktop
> profiles.
Its not supported in nouveau yet.
Protecting users from themselves can be a misfeature. Its better to
educate and then let them freely choose than to play as their nanny.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:25:22 +0200
Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:33:20AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 13:25
I think this is a mistake, libglvnd has a documented performance hit
and should be optional.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/glvnd/libglvnd/-/issues/222
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:23:22 +0200
Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> as by our discussion on #gentoo-desktop, we would like to sort
utable files in the user's $PATH. It should work with posix
compatible shell and about as fast as which(1).
https://notabug.org/orbea/exists/src/master/exists.sh
There are a lot of tests as well.
https://notabug.org/orbea/exists/src/master/test.sh
44 matches
Mail list logo
