On 10-11-2020 09:21:53 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > What instructed you to perform the migration? Was it the news-item? I
> > don't think it should apply for Prefix profiles, and perhaps we should
> > be happy the tool won't work.
>
> It was the big scary warning about the deprecation whenev
10.11.2020 08:55, Fabian Groffen пишет:
> On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>> Hi Fabian
>> I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and there are issues.
>>
>> 1) unsymlink-lib requires "--root ~/gentoo" and otherwise produces an
>> error "/usr/lib is a real directory! was the migra
On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 09:53 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-11-2020 09:49:27 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > So what you're saying is that you've had the wrong value of SYMLINK_LIB
> > > > for ages, and now you've created a meaningless 17.1 profile that chnages
> > > > it but isn't actually
On 10-11-2020 09:49:27 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > So what you're saying is that you've had the wrong value of SYMLINK_LIB
> > > for ages, and now you've created a meaningless 17.1 profile that chnages
> > > it but isn't actually supposed to change anything, correct?
> >
> > I guess, because
On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 09:41 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-11-2020 09:34:52 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 08:55 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > > > Hi Fabian
> > > > I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and the
On 10-11-2020 09:34:52 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 08:55 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > > Hi Fabian
> > > I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and there are issues.
> > >
> > > 1) unsymlink-lib requires "--root ~/gen
On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 08:55 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > Hi Fabian
> > I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and there are issues.
> >
> > 1) unsymlink-lib requires "--root ~/gentoo" and otherwise produces an
> > error "/usr/lib is a real d
On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> Hi Fabian
> I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and there are issues.
>
> 1) unsymlink-lib requires "--root ~/gentoo" and otherwise produces an
> error "/usr/lib is a real directory! was the migration done already?"
I think unsymlink-lib doe
07.11.2020 12:56, Fabian Groffen пишет:
> On 07-11-2020 11:42:44 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>> 22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> Users frequently are
On November 9, 2020 1:54:33 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Stuge wrote:
>Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
>> it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles!
>
>I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the
>surface
>it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about
>eve
On November 9, 2020 6:54:33 AM EST, Peter Stuge wrote:
>Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
>> it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles!
>
>I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the
>surface
>it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about
>everythin
Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles!
I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the surface
it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about everything,
which (regardless of the individual) can't be a good thing..
On 2020-11-09 12:09, Jaco Kroon wrote:
equery has some answers that there are still stuff installed into
/usr/lib32 (which will likely clear over time, and the symlink will be
unmerged). There is this one potential pitfall down the line that I'm
seeing, fairly certain this would have been cover
Hi Ulrich,
On 2020/11/09 12:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> What is the actual "target" objective with the change? I would have
>> expected (not being one to follow this too closely):
>> lib/ - arch independent stuff (eg, netifrc / dhclient etc scripts).
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> What is the actual "target" objective with the change? I would have
> expected (not being one to follow this too closely):
> lib/ - arch independent stuff (eg, netifrc / dhclient etc scripts).
> lib32/ - 32-bit specific stuff (libs for 32-bit).
> li
Hi,
Having just completed the migration on two systems I found some things
which concerns me:
1. A default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop to
default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop. This differs from the no-multilib in
that there are symlinks now for the various lib32 to lib. No such
symlinks on the no-mul
07.11.2020 14:39, Andreas K. Huettel пишет:
>
>
> On November 7, 2020 1:42:44 PM GMT+02:00, Alexey Sokolov
> wrote:
>> 22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
>
On November 7, 2020 1:42:44 PM GMT+02:00, Alexey Sokolov
wrote:
>22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет:
>> Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
>>> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
Users frequently are choosing the wrong profile ver
On 07-11-2020 11:42:44 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> 22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> >> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> >>> Users frequently are choosing the wrong profile versions in new
22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
>> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
>>> Users frequently are choosing the wrong profile versions in new installs
>>> and accidentally downgrading to 17.0 with some
Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> > Users frequently are choosing the wrong profile versions in new installs
> > and accidentally downgrading to 17.0 with some saying they see it first.
> >
> > A simple re
21 matches
Mail list logo
