On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:37 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I think project leads could apply for exception from the council if they
are more like on going maintenance (arch teams come to mind). But
something like Java has had something big in works all the time I have
been involved. I don't really
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has
been
So turn it into one more mundane and pointless task that I am forced to
perform simply because it is a matter of policy? Having to go around
saying yes, this is still correct is rather wasteful, is it not? I
know I would have to do this for several projects, all of which are not
the sort
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
- extend the xml
The difficulty is similar to creating Yet Another format for your page.
- have everyone edit their own project pages
It doesn't matter if you edit file A or file B, IMHO.
- create some parser that has to troll all of the project pages to
create a
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time.
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date. Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you
Petteri Räty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date. Then we require this file to be updated
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date.
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has
been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:34:25PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
I propose we extend project xml to describe current stuff going on in the
project in question and their estimated completion date.
mmm good ...
Then we require this file to be updated monthly.
... not so good
-mike
pgpz8Qu87JVkL.pgp
Bryan Østergaard kirjoitti:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:34:25PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:25 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:25 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated
14 matches
Mail list logo
