Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn: > > adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive >

[gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/08/15 04:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: The more we stuff into the summary line, the harder it will be to write meaningful summaries. And thus, people will write crappy ones or ignore the length limit. I recommend against any more

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn: adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive enough to see what went on while scanning the log. I personally find those summaries a