On Thursday 04 March 2010 19:32:10 Brian Harring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:07:17PM -0600, Dale wrote:
> > chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > > On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > >> Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:07:17PM -0600, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So I don't
> >> think cups warrants to be in the standard desktop
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So I don't
think cups warrants to be in the standard desktop profile.
Cheers,
I print almost daily, but I'm not sure if print
On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So I don't
think cups warrants to be in the standard desktop profile.
Cheers,
I print almost daily, but I'm not sure if printers are commonplace
enough for cups to be a default. Some users may
On 4 March 2010 18:23, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:04:17 + (UTC), Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>> Indeed. Some (many?) of us use printing uncommonly enough that it's
>> cheaper to put it on a thumb drive and take it to a printer than buy a
>> printer -- and pay for a
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:04:17 + (UTC), Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>
wrote:
> Ben de Groot posted on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:28:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> On 4 March 2010 08:08, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>>> Your logic is very thin here. By that same line of reasoning, neither
>>> are the gtk or qt f
