On 06/01/17 15:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> If packages had a field called "BUGS=" it could contain an array of
>> bugs a package is known to contain, but can be conditionally avoided if
>> you're careful.
>>
>> Packages with non-empty BUGS= fie
On 06/01/17 04:27, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed
>> unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things
>> blocking other Gentoo packages).
> I would probably go
On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:13:20 AM EST Michael Mol wrote:
>
> The bigger resource drain, I suspect, will come from maintaining new ebuilds
> of old packages; as eclass development and maintenance seeks to eliminate
> old and buggy code, old ebuilds will need to be dragged along for the ride.
Th
On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:14:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote:
>
> The nice thing about ::graveyard or similar is that its a clear demarcation
> between maintained (in tree) and unmaintained (graveyard.) It also means
> that people doing actual maintenance work can basically ignore the
> graveyard as
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> So my understanding of the status quo is that maintainers get to make the
> call with regard to what is reasonable to keep or drop. I'm loathe to add
> additional policy here; mostly because the expectation is that the
> maintainer has the mo
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed
> > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things
> > blocking other Gentoo packages).
>
>
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> If packages had a field called "BUGS=" it could contain an array of
> bugs a package is known to contain, but can be conditionally avoided if
> you're careful.
>
> Packages with non-empty BUGS= fields would be treated as hard-masked
> for th
On Friday, January 6, 2017 5:27:24 PM EST Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed
> > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things
> > blocking other Gentoo packa
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 05.01.2017 kell 22:00, kirjutas Daniel Campbell:
> I'm in favor of keeping software around until it breaks. When there's
> a
> non-existent upstream and nobody's willing to take up the helm
> themselves, it's a clear indication that it's in danger of being
> treecleaned. In so
On 01/03/2017 06:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
>> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depends on
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 05:11:18 +0200
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I believe with this mgorny has given ample proof that he is just a
> ciaranm sock puppet account.
One neat trick is to have *two* sock puppet accounts, and then have one
accuse the other of being a sock puppet, which typically leads peop
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed
> unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things
> blocking other Gentoo packages).
I would probably go further and extend that argument to older versi
On 03/01/2017 15:24, Damien LEVAC wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
>>>
>>> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
> IMO, this o
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 03.01.2017 kell 09:34, kirjutas Damien LEVAC:
>
> On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> >
> > On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
> > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian
On 01/03/2017 09:10 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine
>> auditing.
>> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for
>> removal. (Call that reason # π, in h
On 01/03/2017 09:11 AM, Damien LEVAC wrote:
> But routine auditing, while being wishful thinking in the open-source
> world (even when the projects are alive), are not meant to find those
> kind of bugs anyway (and wouldn't be effective at doing so either).
>
I think it's wishful thinking in ever
On 01/03/2017 10:41 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing.
Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be conside
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Ideas like this is one reason I'm looking for a corpus of pros and cons for
> treecleaning. I don't see it as black and white. But having ideas like these
> brought up is at least useful.
>
Sure, and almost any rule has its exceptions. My t
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:23:02 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine
> > auditing. Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be
> > considered for removal. (Call that
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine
>> auditing.
>> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for
>> removal. (Call that reaso
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing.
> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for
> removal. (Call that reason #π, in honor of TeX.)
>
Are you suggesting that we should
On 03/01/17 14:57, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote:
>> On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
>>
On 01/03/2017 09:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote:
On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Ja
On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine
> auditing.
> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for
> removal. (Call that reason # π, in honor of TeX.)
A distinction here likely needs to be made
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote:
> On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
> >>
> >> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrot
On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depends on wireless-tools a
On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
>>> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
>>> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT.
>> I use it on 2 notebook
On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depe
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
>
> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
> > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
> > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and WE
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
>> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
>> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT.
this is plain wrong. Upstream is not dead, just not very active any
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
> > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
> > heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT.
> I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of vie
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT.
I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of view) the
most convenient tool to control ethernet and wifi connections on a
no
On 01/01/2017 12:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will retire, so here are my remaining packages.
>
> Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-(
>
>> net-misc/wicd
>
> I can take this one if nobody else is interest
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I will retire, so here are my remaining packages.
Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-(
>net-misc/wicd
I can take this one if nobody else is interested in it.
>Cheers,
>Thomas
>
>
I wish you all the best and if you
On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 10:42:51 +0100
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100
> > Thomas Kahle wrote:
> >
> >> I will retire
> >
> > Sorry to hear that. :(
> >
> >> app-text/tesseract
> >
> > I maintain media-libs/leptonica
On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100
> Thomas Kahle wrote:
>
>> I will retire
>
> Sorry to hear that. :(
>
>> app-text/tesseract
>
> I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because
> of Tesseract. I don't use Tesseract myself
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> I will retire
Sorry to hear that. :(
> app-text/tesseract
I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because
of Tesseract. I don't use Tesseract myself though and it's not a
trivial package to maintain so I'd rather
On 25/11/2016 23:34, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote:
> AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all.
> You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources
> along with your project.
>
>
> You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this
>
> AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all.
> You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources
> along with your project.
>
>
You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this some time ago
as you can read here:
https://github.com/goo
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:25:37 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to pass on maintainership of
> >
> > dev-cpp/gtest
> > dev-cpp/gmock
> >
> > I don't use them and I don't even remember how I came to maintain
> > them. These
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to pass on maintainership of
>
> dev-cpp/gtest
> dev-cpp/gmock
>
> I don't use them and I don't even remember how I came to maintain
> them. These two are among the packages that have googlecode in
> their SRC_URI, so this i
Hi,
I use them so I don't mind (proxy) maintaining them.
gr,
Mathy
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,
Mathy Vanvoorden
2016-11-25 16:06 GMT+01:00 Thomas Kahle :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to pass on maintainership of
>
> dev-cpp/gtest
> dev-cpp/gmock
>
> I don't use them and I don't even rem
interested in euscan
I'm using it in one of my server.
but I'm away untill 14 of this month.
2016/08/07 18:27 "Patrick Lauer" :
> On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> This packages are now up for grabs:
> >> app-portage/euscan
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
>
> x11-misc/revelation
I'm still using this at the moment so I'll take this.
Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 08/19/2016 06:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-crypt/efitools
app-crypt/pesign
app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell
dev-util/cgvg
dev-util/kup
dev-util/xxdi
net-misc/bti
app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell
is quite interesting. I went to greg's site, looked a
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:24:08 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-portage/g-sorcery
> app-portage/gs-elpa
> app-portage/gs-pypi
I'll sign layman project up for these
--
Brian Dolbec
Am Samstag 06 August 2016, 14:44:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-editors/nvi
> dev-cpp/yaml-cpp
I take this one.
Greetings,
Johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> sys-block/zram-init
I'll take this, i use it on my laptops
-- Jason
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:05:06 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-admin/cpulimit
Nice tool, I use it sometimes, so I'll take it.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpO3kRrhnkEw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:35 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
> >This packages are now up for grabs:
> >app-arch/lzop
> >dev-libs/check
> >dev-libs/lzo
>
> I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I
> t
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> x11-libs/xosd
I'll proxy this. I'll look over the bugs.
//Peter
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió:
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but..
> >
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pac
Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
>This packages are now up for grabs:
>app-arch/lzop
>dev-libs/check
>dev-libs/lzo
I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I
think check is needed by one of my packages.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> This packages are now up for grabs:
>> app-portage/euscan
>
> Patrick,
>
> Are you still keeping euscan running?
>
Yes. It's not in the best shape, but for now it works well enough to
keep it
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-portage/euscan
Patrick,
Are you still keeping euscan running?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Deven Lahoti wrote:
> What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an
> official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it
> fairly often.
That would be great!
I think you want to start by looking at proxy maintenanc
What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an
official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it
fairly often.
On Aug 7, 2016 03:41, "Pacho Ramos" wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-misc/sl
> app-portage/epkg
> dev-libs/libmcs
> d
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-eselect/eselect-lua
I'm taking this one, we use lua at work so I have an interest in it.
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but..
..
> > ..do you think you can arrange to post everything in one mail,
> > instead of 14 different ones in a single day?
>
> I suppose these posts are automated (at least pa
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote:
> Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but..
>
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Pacho R
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:36:54 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
>This packages are now up for grabs:
>app-admin/keepassx
>media-sound/mumble
>media-sound/murmur
>
>
I gonna take all three packages.
--
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39
Attentio
Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but..
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Pacho Ra
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:53:07 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote:
> app-cdr/bashburn
> media-sound/apulse
>
> I no longer own an optical drive, and eventually had to get PA working
> in order to use OBS (they have limited ALSA functionality for the time
> being), so I'm unable to test them. Any takers?
>
Hi
I'll take sys-apps/razercfg as a proxy maintainer.
Regards,
Ashish Gupta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/06/16 22:37, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> sys-apps/razercfg
I'm not an ebuild person, but if someone could maintain this I would
be grateful.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
On 06/12/2016 04:01 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:42:03 -0500 james wrote:
On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
> anymore, they are all up for grabs.
>
> - media-gfx/openmesh [no proj
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:42:03 -0500 james wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
> > anymore, they are all up for grabs.
> >
> > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project]
> > - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluste
On 12/06/16 18:57, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> please avoid html e-mails
> -mike
And PGP/MIME is your friend :]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
please avoid html e-mails
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:37:42PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-admin/ccze
> app-crypt/ckpass
> app-mobilephone/sobexsrv
> dev-libs/libkpass
> media-gfx/qrencode
> sys-apps/razercfg
> x11-misc/xdotool
>
>
If no one else puts their hand up ill proxy maint
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:08 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 11 czerwca 2016 22:37:42 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
> >media-gfx/qrencode
>
> I'll take this one since it's used by systemd and pshs.
Looks like we had an maintenance claiming clash (I was just 5
minutes earlier). Feel free to
Dnia 11 czerwca 2016 22:37:42 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
>media-gfx/qrencode
I'll take this one since it's used by systemd and pshs.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny (by phone)
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 22:37:42 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
[...]
> app-mobilephone/sobexsrv
> media-gfx/qrencode
I use these packages, so I'll take them.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpaS26vxlznX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 22:48 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió:
> >
> > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these
> > packages
> > > anymore, they are all up for grabs.
> >
El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió:
> On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these
> packages
> > anymore, they are all up for grabs.
> >
> > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project]
> > - sys-cluster/gangli
On 02/06/16 11:42 AM, james wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
>> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
>> anymore, they are all up for grabs.
>>
>> - media-gfx/openmesh [no project]
>> - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluster]
>> - sys-cluste
On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
> anymore, they are all up for grabs.
>
> - media-gfx/openmesh [no project]
> - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluster]
> - sys-cluster/ganglia-web [cluster]
> - sys-clu
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> dev-python/path-and-address
I've added the python project here, too.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> dev-python/pylast
I've added the python project for this one.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 01/24/2016 11:49 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 24/01/16 10:39, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>> Alex Brandt writes:
>>> * app-backup/rdiff-backup
>> Wasn't it meant for removal?
>>
>> -- Amadeusz Żołnowski
> Looks fine on p.g.o stable too. Upstream site is present.
>
Inactive upstream, known d
On Sunday 24 January 2016 10:39:42 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Alex Brandt writes:
> > * app-backup/rdiff-backup
>
> Wasn't it meant for removal?
Yes, it was. I'm considering doing a last-rites again but am
giving people an opportunity before that to lay claim. Let's
update this one to: if n
On 24/01/16 10:39, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Alex Brandt writes:
>> * app-backup/rdiff-backup
> Wasn't it meant for removal?
>
> -- Amadeusz Żołnowski
Looks fine on p.g.o stable too. Upstream site is present.
Alex Brandt writes:
> * app-backup/rdiff-backup
Wasn't it meant for removal?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/30/2015 02:26 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 06/20/2015 05:35 AM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
>> Sorry for not replying sooner; my client didn't seem to reflect
>> folder updates...
>>
>> Are there any urgent bugs right now
Hi Daniel,
On 06/20/2015 05:35 AM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
> Sorry for not replying sooner; my client didn't seem to reflect folder
> updates...
>
> Are there any urgent bugs right now? I'm moving tomorrow and won't be
> able to tend to them if so, but I am interested in taking
> maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/16/2015 01:25 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> so will you take the maintainership? I will reassign bugs to you
> then.
>
> On 06/06/2015 09:23 PM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
>> On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
Hi Daniel,
so will you take the maintainership? I will reassign bugs to you then.
On 06/06/2015 09:23 PM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
> On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in:
>
>> media-sound/apulse -- needs version b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in:
>
> media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump dev-util/android-ndk --
> needs version bump
>
> I will remove myself from maintainers o
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:02:48PM +0200, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in:
>
> media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump
> dev-util/android-ndk -- needs version bump
I'll take android-ndk since I already maintain android-studio.
-- Jason
On Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:05 +0200
Matthias Maier wrote:
> Just a bunch of packages I'm no longer interested in (and that are
> hardly useful to begin with...):
>
> app-misc/grabcartoons
> sys-apps/conspy
> sys-fs/safecopy
>
> Best,
> Matthias
I'll take sys-fs/safecopy as I've used it on
On 21:13 Tue 21 Apr , Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due to iksaif not having enough time to maintain this, the following package
> if up for grabs now:
> sys-fs/dfc
I can take this, current there is one open bug (version bump)
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Key ID AABEFD55
El mar, 20-01-2015 a las 11:21 +0100, Hanno Böck escribió:
[...]
> maintainer-wanted or if they're likely broken anyway just removed.
s/-wanted/-needed/ :)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> net-proxy/dante
I maintained this back in 2003, i'll take it on again.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Done, this packages are now up for grabs:
> net-libs/libecap
Got it. Need it as a dependency for net-proxy/squid. Help is always
welcome.
--
Eray
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
> > I will probably remove it in a week or so as looks like nobody added to
> > it :/
>
> Done, this packages are now up for grabs:
> net-proxy/pingtunnel
> net-proxy/pol
El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200
> > Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> >
> > > I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd.
> >
> > Drawing extra attention to this sentence; it
El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200
> Pavlos Ratis wrote:
>
> > I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd.
>
> Drawing extra attention to this sentence; it looks like the herd is
> (once again) going to be empty, as the result of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/11/14 10:51, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I have a lot of IRL things going on
Gentoo is a strange place. But let me assure you, this is real life too.
Happy hacking.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEG
On 11/26/2014 03:15 AM, Yixun Lan wrote:
> On 21:08 Sun 23 Nov , Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to take x11-misc/spacefm if a developer is willing to allow
>> me to proxy-maint until I become a developer.
>
> update metadata.xml, using your email found in bugzie.
> and current no bug op
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 02:17:05 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> packages up for grab:
> co-maintained by games
> dev-games/goatee
> games-board/goatee-gtk
As the developer of these, I would be happy to help proxy-maintain
them. I have little ebuild experience, but can write bash and this is
301 - 400 of 753 matches
Mail list logo