Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 05:11:18 +0200 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I believe with this mgorny has given ample proof that he is just a > ciaranm sock puppet account. One neat trick is to have *two* sock puppet accounts, and then have one accuse the other of being a sock puppet, which

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things > blocking other Gentoo packages). I would probably go further and extend that

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 03/01/2017 15:24, Damien LEVAC wrote: > > > On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) >>> >>> gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > IMO, this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 03.01.2017 kell 09:34, kirjutas Damien LEVAC: > > On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > > On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017,

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:10 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine >> auditing. >> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for >> removal. (Call that reason # π, in

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:11 AM, Damien LEVAC wrote: > But routine auditing, while being wishful thinking in the open-source > world (even when the projects are alive), are not meant to find those > kind of bugs anyway (and wouldn't be effective at doing so either). > I think it's wishful thinking in

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 10:41 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing. Unless someone's doing

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > Ideas like this is one reason I'm looking for a corpus of pros and cons for > treecleaning. I don't see it as black and white. But having ideas like these > brought up is at least useful. > Sure, and almost any rule has

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:23:02 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine > > auditing. Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be > > considered for

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine >> auditing. >> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing. > Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for > removal. (Call that reason #π, in honor of TeX.) > Are you

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 03/01/17 14:57, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: >> On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine > auditing. > Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for > removal. (Call that reason # π, in honor of TeX.) A distinction here likely needs to be made

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: > On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > >> > >> gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily depends on wireless-tools

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: >>> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it >>> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. >> I use it on 2

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily

Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it > > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Hi, On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: >On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: >> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it >> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. this is plain wrong. Upstream is not dead, just not very active

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. > I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of view) the most convenient tool to control ethernet and wifi connections on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/01/2017 12:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. > > Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-( > >> net-misc/wicd > > I can take this one if nobody else is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Hi Thomas, On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: >Hi, > >I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-( >net-misc/wicd I can take this one if nobody else is interested in it. >Cheers, >Thomas > > I wish you all the best and if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 10:42:51 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 > > Thomas Kahle wrote: > > > >> I will retire > > > > Sorry to hear that. :( > > > >> app-text/tesseract > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 > Thomas Kahle wrote: > >> I will retire > > Sorry to hear that. :( > >> app-text/tesseract > > I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because > of Tesseract. I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > I will retire Sorry to hear that. :( > app-text/tesseract I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because of Tesseract. I don't use Tesseract myself though and it's not a trivial package to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 25/11/2016 23:34, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all. > You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources > along with your project. > > > You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

> > AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all. > You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources > along with your project. > > You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this some time ago as you can read here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:25:37 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > > > dev-cpp/gtest > > dev-cpp/gmock > > > > I don't use them and I don't even remember

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > dev-cpp/gtest > dev-cpp/gmock > > I don't use them and I don't even remember how I came to maintain > them. These two are among the packages that have googlecode in > their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, I use them so I don't mind (proxy) maintaining them. gr, Mathy -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden 2016-11-25 16:06 GMT+01:00 Thomas Kahle : > Hi, > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > dev-cpp/gtest > dev-cpp/gmock > > I don't use them

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

interested in euscan I'm using it in one of my server. but I'm away untill 14 of this month. 2016/08/07 18:27 "Patrick Lauer" : > On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> This packages are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: >  > x11-misc/revelation I'm still using this at the moment so I'll take this. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 08/19/2016 06:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This packages are now up for grabs: app-crypt/efitools app-crypt/pesign app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell dev-util/cgvg dev-util/kup dev-util/xxdi net-misc/bti app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell is quite interesting. I went to greg's site, looked

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:24:08 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-portage/g-sorcery > app-portage/gs-elpa > app-portage/gs-pypi I'll sign layman project up for these -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Am Samstag 06 August 2016, 14:44:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-editors/nvi > dev-cpp/yaml-cpp I take this one. Greetings, Johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > sys-block/zram-init I'll take this, i use it on my laptops -- Jason

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:05:06 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-admin/cpulimit Nice tool, I use it sometimes, so I'll take it. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgpO3kRrhnkEw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:35 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): > >This packages are now up for grabs: > >app-arch/lzop > >dev-libs/check > >dev-libs/lzo > > I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. > > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): >This packages are now up for grabs: >app-arch/lzop >dev-libs/check >dev-libs/lzo I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I think check is needed by one of my packages. -- Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> This packages are now up for grabs: >> app-portage/euscan > > Patrick, > > Are you still keeping euscan running? > Yes. It's not in the best shape, but for now it works

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-portage/euscan Patrick, Are you still keeping euscan running? Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Deven Lahoti wrote: > What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an > official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it > fairly often. That would be great! I think you want to start by looking at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it fairly often. On Aug 7, 2016 03:41, "Pacho Ramos" wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-misc/sl > app-portage/epkg >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-eselect/eselect-lua I'm taking this one, we use lua at work so I have an interest in it. William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote: > > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. .. > > ..do you think you can arrange to post everything in one mail, > > instead of 14 different ones in a single day? > > I suppose these posts are automated (at least

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:36:54 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: >This packages are now up for grabs: >app-admin/keepassx >media-sound/mumble >media-sound/murmur > > I gonna take all three packages. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho Ramos wrote: Pacho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:53:07 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > app-cdr/bashburn > media-sound/apulse > > I no longer own an optical drive, and eventually had to get PA working > in order to use OBS (they have limited ALSA functionality for the time > being), so I'm unable to test them. Any takers? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi I'll take sys-apps/razercfg as a proxy maintainer. Regards, Ashish Gupta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/06/16 22:37, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-apps/razercfg I'm not an ebuild person, but if someone could maintain this I would be grateful. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/12/2016 04:01 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:42:03 -0500 james wrote: On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > > - media-gfx/openmesh [no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:42:03 -0500 james wrote: > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages > > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > > > > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] > > - sys-cluster/ganglia

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 12/06/16 18:57, Mike Frysinger wrote: > please avoid html e-mails > -mike And PGP/MIME is your friend :] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

please avoid html e-mails -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:37:42PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-admin/ccze > app-crypt/ckpass > app-mobilephone/sobexsrv > dev-libs/libkpass > media-gfx/qrencode > sys-apps/razercfg > x11-misc/xdotool > > If no one else puts their hand up ill proxy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:08 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 11 czerwca 2016 22:37:42 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): > >media-gfx/qrencode > > I'll take this one since it's used by systemd and pshs. Looks like we had an maintenance claiming clash (I was just 5 minutes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Dnia 11 czerwca 2016 22:37:42 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): >media-gfx/qrencode I'll take this one since it's used by systemd and pshs. -- Best regards, Michał Górny (by phone)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 22:37:42 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: [...] > app-mobilephone/sobexsrv > media-gfx/qrencode I use these packages, so I'll take them. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgpaS26vxlznX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 22:48 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió: > > > > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > >  > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these > > packages  > >  > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió: > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: >  > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these > packages  >  > anymore, they are all up for grabs. >  > >  >  - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] >  >  -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 02/06/16 11:42 AM, james wrote: > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: >> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages >> anymore, they are all up for grabs. >> >> - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] >> - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluster] >> -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] > - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluster] > - sys-cluster/ganglia-web [cluster] > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > dev-python/path-and-address I've added the python project here, too. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/pylast I've added the python project for this one. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

On 24/01/16 10:39, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: > Alex Brandt writes: >> * app-backup/rdiff-backup > Wasn't it meant for removal? > > -- Amadeusz Żołnowski Looks fine on p.g.o stable too. Upstream site is present.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

Alex Brandt writes: > * app-backup/rdiff-backup Wasn't it meant for removal? -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

On Sunday 24 January 2016 10:39:42 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: > Alex Brandt writes: > > * app-backup/rdiff-backup > > Wasn't it meant for removal? Yes, it was. I'm considering doing a last-rites again but am giving people an opportunity before that to lay claim. Let's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

On 01/24/2016 11:49 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 24/01/16 10:39, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: >> Alex Brandt writes: >>> * app-backup/rdiff-backup >> Wasn't it meant for removal? >> >> -- Amadeusz Żołnowski > Looks fine on p.g.o stable too. Upstream site is present. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/30/2015 02:26 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi Daniel, On 06/20/2015 05:35 AM, Daniel zlg Campbell wrote: Sorry for not replying sooner; my client didn't seem to reflect folder updates... Are there any urgent bugs right now? I'm moving

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi Daniel, On 06/20/2015 05:35 AM, Daniel zlg Campbell wrote: Sorry for not replying sooner; my client didn't seem to reflect folder updates... Are there any urgent bugs right now? I'm moving tomorrow and won't be able to tend to them if so, but I am interested in taking maintainership of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/16/2015 01:25 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi Daniel, so will you take the maintainership? I will reassign bugs to you then. On 06/06/2015 09:23 PM, Daniel zlg Campbell wrote: On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi Daniel, so will you take the maintainership? I will reassign bugs to you then. On 06/06/2015 09:23 PM, Daniel zlg Campbell wrote: On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi, the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in: media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:02:48PM +0200, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi, the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in: media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump dev-util/android-ndk -- needs version bump I'll take android-ndk since I already maintain android-studio. -- Jason

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: Hi, the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in: media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump dev-util/android-ndk -- needs version bump I will remove myself from maintainers of these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:05 +0200 Matthias Maier tam...@gentoo.org wrote: Just a bunch of packages I'm no longer interested in (and that are hardly useful to begin with...): app-misc/grabcartoons sys-apps/conspy sys-fs/safecopy Best, Matthias I'll take sys-fs/safecopy as I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21:13 Tue 21 Apr , Pacho Ramos wrote: Due to iksaif not having enough time to maintain this, the following package if up for grabs now: sys-fs/dfc I can take this, current there is one open bug (version bump) -- Yixun Lan (dlan) Gentoo Linux Developer GPG Key ID AABEFD55

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El mar, 20-01-2015 a las 11:21 +0100, Hanno Böck escribió: [...] maintainer-wanted or if they're likely broken anyway just removed. s/-wanted/-needed/ :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: net-proxy/dante I maintained this back in 2003, i'll take it on again. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: Done, this packages are now up for grabs: net-libs/libecap Got it. Need it as a dependency for net-proxy/squid. Help is always welcome. -- Eray

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200 Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote: I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd. Drawing extra attention to this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: [...] I will probably remove it in a week or so as looks like nobody added to it :/ Done, this packages are now up for grabs: net-proxy/pingtunnel net-proxy/polipo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200 Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote: I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd. Drawing extra attention to this sentence; it looks like the herd is (once again) going to be empty, as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 27/11/14 10:51, Daniel Campbell wrote: I have a lot of IRL things going on Gentoo is a strange place. But let me assure you, this is real life too. Happy hacking. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 11/26/2014 03:15 AM, Yixun Lan wrote: On 21:08 Sun 23 Nov , Daniel Campbell wrote: I'd like to take x11-misc/spacefm if a developer is willing to allow me to proxy-maint until I become a developer. update metadata.xml, using your email found in bugzie. and current no bug opened,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21:08 Sun 23 Nov , Daniel Campbell wrote: I'd like to take x11-misc/spacefm if a developer is willing to allow me to proxy-maint until I become a developer. update metadata.xml, using your email found in bugzie. and current no bug opened, thanks btw, any particular reason why should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 22:40 Sun 23 Nov , Alex Xu wrote: On 23/11/14 08:17 PM, hasufell wrote: packages up for grab: I didn't change metadata.xml, nor bug reports for any of those, because I was too lazy. If you grab one, please do so yourself. how will bug-wranglers know where to assign packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello ablepharus I couldn't found your account info (base your email) in bugzilla. also I'd be happy if you can convince me you do have a few experience on ebuilds writing ;-) assume you already familiar with how @proxy-maint goes[1] thanks [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

14.11.2014 06:16, Tom Wijsman пишет: Due to lack of time I'm giving up some packages. Feel free to take them: app-admin/logmon Split-screen terminal/ncurses based log viewer I have taken that, nice tool -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 02:17:05 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: packages up for grab: co-maintained by games ga...@gentoo.org dev-games/goatee games-board/goatee-gtk As the developer of these, I would be happy to help proxy-maintain them. I have little ebuild experience,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

I would like to take care of the following packages but I would need a proxy-maintainer. hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org writes: app-admin/clustershell dev-python/simplegui dev-python/jedi dev-libs/mathjax net-misc/youtube-viewer co-maintained by games ga...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 2014-11-23 20:17, hasufell wrote: dev-python/jedi I'll help maintain this. Tim pgpeY1d3cCgA7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote: net-misc/dropbox-cli I use it every day, works fine. No bugs. I take it. I'd like to add a bash-completion file for dropbox-cli. Andrey

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 11/24/2014 02:17 AM, hasufell wrote: packages up for grab: I didn't change metadata.xml, nor bug reports for any of those, because I was too lazy. If you grab one, please do so yourself. sys-apps/etckeeper Looks like this slipped in here by accident. I can handle it myself, so I'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/23/2014 07:17 PM, hasufell wrote: packages up for grab: I didn't change metadata.xml, nor bug reports for any of those, because I was too lazy. If you grab one, please do so yourself. app-admin/clustershell app-admin/durep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 23/11/14 08:17 PM, hasufell wrote: packages up for grab: I didn't change metadata.xml, nor bug reports for any of those, because I was too lazy. If you grab one, please do so yourself. how will bug-wranglers know where to assign packages then? app-misc/trash-cli co-maintained by

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:16:10 +0100 Tom Wijsman wrote: Hello all Due to lack of time I'm giving up some packages. Feel free to take them: [...] dev-util/oprofile A transparent low-overhead system-wide profiler I use this util often, so I'll take it. If anyone want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-python/markups A wrapper around various text markups The python team can take this one. Cheers, Dirkjan

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >