Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-07-01 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:19:58 +0100 James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot > > > wrote: > > > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be > > > > masked by defa

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-07-01 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > No. Alpha is little endian. > > Wikipedia says it is bi. tc-native() reports alpha* as big so I guess > that's the only variant we support? Then again, this page says it is > usually little. Is tc-native() wrong? > > https://kernelnewbies.org/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:37:49 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot > >> > wrote: > >> > > I am therefore proposing a n

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > James Le Cuirot wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: >> > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be >> > > masked by default and unmasked +

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be > > > masked by default and unmasked + forced in the relevant profiles under > > > arch. I will apply