Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall we create a ballot for PROPERTIES value definition proposals?
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello everyone, Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed property definition and they would also be able to write in one or more alternative names for the definition. I don't know what the best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody have any suggestions? have the council sign of whatever compromise looks like it made it way through. the current process seems to work very well, me thinks. thanks for your effort, BTW. best regards Thilo Thanks, Zac [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_e145fc04e907de72e30d88285afb1 34c.xml signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall we create a ballot for PROPERTIES value definition proposals?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed property definition and they would also be able to write in one or more alternative names for the definition. I don't know what the best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody have any suggestions? Thanks, Zac [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_e145fc04e907de72e30d88285afb134c.xml -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiZhOUACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPuhQCfYkF8KM9TchrnoveUTvm5oDy6 n9UAoMfh6PqBixBYokm64DRN9oPqyiwQ =iVaC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall we create a ballot for PROPERTIES value definition proposals?
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:03:02 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed property definition and they would also be able to write in one or more alternative names for the definition. I don't know what the best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody have any suggestions? What's wrong with just discussing it until we agree? Why do you think a compromise is necessary? -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall we create a ballot for PROPERTIES value definition proposals?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: What's wrong with just discussing it until we agree? Why do you think a compromise is necessary? I think voting might be an interesting approach. We'll see if anyone else is interested. I don't know yet. :) Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiZi3IACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPOhwCghN4mT7tHfS/FBdwP5Cpxm8ak pWsAoMg6Rw6liGyZRYyai6Vamv/zMSrP =o48k -END PGP SIGNATURE-
