Re: USE=multislot, xDEPEND-syntax in SLOT and Slot dependencies [Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags]

2008-10-15 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:20:32 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ignoring Vapier's tirade against ciaranm there, we need the > xDEPEND-syntax for SLOTS as the real solution, however that still > wouldn't resolve the portion that has CTARGET as part of the SLOT, > since metadata g

USE=multislot, xDEPEND-syntax in SLOT and Slot dependencies [Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags]

2008-10-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
I'm deliberately starting a new thread here, because this is meandering well off the original topic of the global useflag proposals. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:18:16AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > There are also other issues, e.g. it breaks the generation of the > @installed package set as the ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags

2008-10-15 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:19:27 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:47:06 -0700 > "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Utterly illegal, needs to die. > > > > Why? I don't agree th

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags

2008-10-15 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:47:06 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Utterly illegal, needs to die. > > Why? I don't agree that it needs to be the global useflags, but I > don't consider it illegal either. It's ille

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags

2008-10-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Utterly illegal, needs to die. Why? I don't agree that it needs to be the global useflags, but I don't consider it illegal either. It's defined by toolchain.eclass and toolchain-binutils.eclass, and deliberately in a very careful m

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags

2008-10-15 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:36:32 +0200 Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > server16 Already been discussed, can't be done. > logrotate 10 Already been discussed. Will no doubt descend into the same long argument that happens every time this comes up.

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] some global useflags

2008-10-15 Thread Markus Meier
server16 logrotate 10 gsm 9 custom-cflags 9 kontact 8 openmp8 plasma7 html 7 demo 7 smp