* Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
> Ah, so you want us to use your git repos as patch managers? That
> clears up a few things.
I dont want you to use *my* repos. But I'd like to advocate git-based
workflows (eg. downstream branches w/ rebase, etc) instead of loose
patches. And I'm offering you an prov
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
>> > Thats not even necessary. They just should use the infrastructure,
>> > as described in my paper. So everyone can easily set up automatic
>> > notifications, cherry-pick, etc, etc.
>>
>> Why should we?
>
> T
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto schrieb:
> just because you decided to "offer" some service, it in no way "forces
> us" to accept it.
No, it does not. I never claimed that.
And so really I dont understand that fundamentalistic kind of
argumentation (which is really near to ranting).
> With your p
* Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
> > Thats not even necessary. They just should use the infrastructure,
> > as described in my paper. So everyone can easily set up automatic
> > notifications, cherry-pick, etc, etc.
>
> Why should we?
To make tracking and applying other's changes much easier.
Curre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirbheek,
thanks for writing such a well thought-out and comprehensive reply to
Enrico. I agree with all the points you raised.
On 11-07-2010 10:28, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> * Nirbheek Chauh
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
>> I don't see how these various distros can be made to agree with
>> each other and I certainly can't see them using a common tarball
>> source.
>
> Thats not even necessary. They just should use the infrastruct
* Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
> If I understand your system correctly, you essentially maintain clones
> of upstream repos, with all the various distro patches applied on top,
> and release tarballs as well.
Yes. And if some upstream does not provide suitable vcs access
(or doesnt even have one),
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> The point is: I have to maintain lots of packages for different distros,
> as well as for my own build system. I cannot do this manually for each
> single distro, so I prefer doing _generic_ fixes and let the distro
> buildfiles only do the
* Hans de Graaff schrieb:
> I do understand the response, because part of the strategy mentioned
> *is* not to provide plain-text patches, but instead manage them,
> possibly jointly with other distributions, in a midstream repository.
Exactly.
The point is: I have to maintain lots of packages
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 01:28 -0400, Jacob Godserv wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:13, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > I've already explained the strategy behind the git repo (and not
> > doing plaintext patches). Please refer to my paper, and my other
> > mails posted recently on this list.
>
> I'm
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:13, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I've already explained the strategy behind the git repo (and not
> doing plaintext patches). Please refer to my paper, and my other
> mails posted recently on this list.
I'm not quite sure I understand your response here. He didn't ask for
yo
* Samuli Suominen schrieb:
> On 07/08/2010 01:56 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> > YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
> >
> > It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> > missing maildir directories.
>
> Provide your patches as plain/te
* Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
Hi,
> > It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> > missing maildir directories.
> Stock procmail does this already.
>
> From procmailrc:
> If the mailbox is specified to be an MH folder or maildir folder,
> procmail will create the necessar
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
>
> It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> missing maildir directories.
Stock procmail does this already.
>From procmailrc:
If the mailbox is specified to be
On 07/08/2010 01:56 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
>
> It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> missing maildir directories.
Provide your patches as plain/text attachments like everyone else does,
can't expe
Hi folks,
YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
missing maildir directories.
cu
- Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org -
From: bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org
Subject: [Bug 322157] [mail-filter/procmail
16 matches
Mail list logo
