On Sunday 24 May 2009 23:22:21 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:16:13 +0200
>
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > Okay, yes, Mr. Long was quite rude there (trying to fight fire with
> > fire I guess). But in this case you're discussing rather subjective
> > things again (how often is it the
On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:16:13 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Okay, yes, Mr. Long was quite rude there (trying to fight fire with
> fire I guess). But in this case you're discussing rather subjective
> things again (how often is it the case that you don't have a cache?)
> that might not even be a prob
2009-05-17 18:20:21 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
> I would like to suggest to include possibility of using of features of
> bash-4.0 (and older versions) in local scope of EAPI="3" ebuilds.
>
> I know that it's slightly late, but this change is very easy to implement
> (adjustin
On Sunday 24 May 2009 22:43:52 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Here, this sums up what's wrong with most of your cockamamy ideas (as
> > attractive, and oh so right, as they may seem to you now):
> >
> > http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s07.html
> >
> > To paraphrase you: Go and read it
On Sun, 24 May 2009 21:31:56 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> > ...but that's not what happens. Instead, the users get their screen
> > spammed with annoying messages,
>
> Er I think you're confusing paludis and portage.
Er. No. As you would know had you read GLEP 55, Portage is noisy if you
use bash
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009 19:57:49 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> > We always have to assume that there might not be an up to date
>> > cache. The Gentoo rsync mirrors do not always ship up to date cache,
>> > particularly if someone's just changed a wide
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis posted
200905211957.55040.arfre...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Thu, 21 May
2009 19:57:49 +0200:
> 2009-05-20 20:00:43 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
>> On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:56 +0200
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> > This error occurs on