[gentoo-dev] Re: 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-29 Thread Duncan
Dale posted 4a480ec2.7030...@gmail.com, excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:45:54 -0500: > It's also what I hate about our government here. >From the context, I understood "here" /not/ to mean Gentoo. FYI, while it's tempting to make comments paralleling various wider world political hap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Dale
Duncan wrote: > Dale posted 4a47f8e3.8070...@gmail.com, excerpted > below, on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:12:35 -0500: > > >> As a long time Gentoo user, I have to ask. Why is that EVERYONE on the >> council must be there or have someone there to represent them? Would >> Gentoo come to a end if one

[gentoo-dev] Re: 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Duncan
Dale posted 4a47f8e3.8070...@gmail.com, excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:12:35 -0500: > As a long time Gentoo user, I have to ask. Why is that EVERYONE on the > council must be there or have someone there to represent them? Would > Gentoo come to a end if one person or even two people w

[gentoo-dev] Re: 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Duncan
Ferris McCormick posted 20090628221421.1c9f8...@anaconda.krait.us, excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:14:21 +: >> Its my opinion that the concept of proxies in council meetings is >> fatally flawed. >> >> 1. The brief (if any) that the proxy is given by the council member >> being prox

[gentoo-dev] Re: 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-25 Thread Duncan
Alistair Bush posted 4a43e30e.4090...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:22 +1200: > I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't see > anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other members of > the community take a look at themselves be