Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:42:45 Duncan wrote:
Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted:
On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebasti
On Friday 11 September 2009 19:48:03 George Prowse wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > ...
>
> Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major
> reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage.
>
> We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage i
Mike Frysinger wrote:
...
Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major
reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage.
We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage is at
2.1 currently. Tie it in and we have 2.2 (currently masked) nex
On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:42:45 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted:
> > On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping
Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> > 10.0 is retar
