On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell
> me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only
> relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. What is the
> use case for expor
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see what's wrong with EAPI (if set, otherwise implicitly whatever
> the ebuild sets, or 0 if not set there) only applying to the file it's
> declared in.
Because that doesn't work at all, see
http://article.gmane.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:52:53 +
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:03:12 +
>> > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> * Set the EAPI inside the ebuild in a way that makes it easy to
>> >> fetch it This
