Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-16 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-07-16 03:23:05 Ryan Hill napisał(a): On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: all, I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time to toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-16 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-07-16 04:28:33 Ryan Hill napisał(a): On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:09:36 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: all, I'm

[gentoo-dev] Re: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: all, I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time to toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The issue is that we need glibc 2.5 or higher and not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-15 Thread Doug Goldstein
Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: all, I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time to toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The issue is that we need glibc 2.5 or

[gentoo-dev] Re: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:09:36 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: all, I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful.