Ulrich Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Lexical Analyser and a Parser Generator are also required by
IEEE Std 1003.1 (aka POSIX) as part of the C-Language Development
Utilities.
So it doesn't make much sense to remove flex and bison from system.
IIRC POSIX mandates vi too, and we don't
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
A Lexical Analyser and a Parser Generator are also required by
IEEE Std 1003.1 (aka POSIX) as part of the C-Language Development
Utilities.
IIRC POSIX mandates vi too, and we don't have that in system.
No, it's optional (User
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Ryan Hill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
- bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly
used so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
- bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly used
so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on every
On Sun, 11 May 2008 19:46:36 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I don't see the point. If you do move them, don't forget
about documentation changes.
Also consider that people searching for bugs about dev-util/ccache for
example won't find many results.
--
fonts, gcc-porting,
