Am Samstag, 22. Februar 2014, 19:02:54 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
>
>
> (Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?)
If there is a clear distinction between a core set of packages and extra stuff
(as in e.g. kde4), the combination mate-b
On 02/23/2014 05:02 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>>
That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
category for all of it,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> While still inconsistent with what already exists, that indeed sounds
> sane towards the user, +1; does someone object 'mate-desktop'?
I was thinking mate-de, but -desktop seems okay, too.
Anyway, you should probably give people some time to
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> >> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
> >> category for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the
> >> name.
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single category
>> for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the name.
>
> TL;DR: Yes, we could try that; but what would be a consistent name?
mate-desktop ?
(T
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM, George Shapovalov
> wrote:
>> Besides, in my opinion, the ability to see "what's there" in at least
>> minimally categorized way without having to resort to using some special
>> tools or going to some website is worht something. In this va
