On 04/08/2013 01:14 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to
PAX_MARKINGS=none,
and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different value.
That
Mike Gilbert schrieb:
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kernel configuration,
filesystem and mount options.
I'd say that
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Mike Gilbert schrieb:
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call
no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both or neither
On 04/08/2013 12:08 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 04/07/2013 05:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call
no
longer has a ||
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to
PAX_MARKINGS=none,
and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different
value.
That makes some sense to me. The downside is
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kernel configuration,
filesystem and mount options.
I'd say that is not a good
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings
On 04/07/2013 05:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:08:41 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can try to get the user.pax on tmpfs patch into the Linux tree. At
the very least, we can get it into gentoo-sources.
What does this patch do? I haven't been following this discussion;
also, please CC
On 04/07/2013 07:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:08:41 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can try to get the user.pax on tmpfs patch into the Linux tree. At
the very least, we can get it into gentoo-sources.
What does this patch do? I haven't been following
10 matches
Mail list logo
