Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 14:26 schrieb Alec Warner: Eselect, your project pages lists retired developers (Ciaran).[4] Ciaran is the original Author, and he still helps more than ocassionally with problems and bugs. I won't remove him from that page. As precedences, the Gentoo Handbook list

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Alec Warner
Danny van Dyk wrote: Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 14:26 schrieb Alec Warner: Eselect, your project pages lists retired developers (Ciaran).[4] Ciaran is the original Author, and he still helps more than ocassionally with problems and bugs. I won't remove him from that page. As

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: The only problem is that it lists him as contactable by [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is false. Also the whole section is called Developers, not people who once contributed but aren't developers any more or eventually

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Alec Warner
Wernfried Haas wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: The only problem is that it lists him as contactable by [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is false. Also the whole section is called Developers, not people who once contributed but aren't

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Christian Heim
On Wednesday, 30. August. 2006 16:36, Wernfried Haas wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: The only problem is that it lists him as contactable by [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is false. Also the whole section is called Developers, not people

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:11:10AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: Damn you for using my project page against me! :P insert evil laughter here Phreak wrote that part actually ;) I was hoping for a more graceful solution than separate sections. As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Christian Heim wrote: If you take a look at the plain XML, you'll see that's a custom made table. As Alec suggested it would be nice to have a modified version of the dev-tag (accepting something like role=contributor and according to that listing

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Simon Stelling
Wernfried Haas wrote: As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections quite good as it's a clear solution as it's easy to see who is an official Gentoo monkey who did all the quiz stuff etc. May be subject to personal taste though. Well, yeah, it just makes we wonder what the fuck an ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Alec Warner
Simon Stelling wrote: Wernfried Haas wrote: As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections quite good as it's a clear solution as it's easy to see who is an official Gentoo monkey who did all the quiz stuff etc. May be subject to personal taste though. Well, yeah, it just makes we wonder

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:26:41AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: A project exists if it has a web page at www.g.o/proj/en/whatever that is maintained. (Maintained means that the information on the page is factually correct and not out-of-date.) If the webpage isn't maintained, it is presumed dead.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Xavier Neys
Alec Warner wrote: Danny van Dyk wrote: Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 14:26 schrieb Alec Warner: Eselect, your project pages lists retired developers (Ciaran).[4] Ciaran is the original Author, and he still helps more than ocassionally with problems and bugs. I won't remove him from that