I'm about to package.mask this package and plan on removing it in 30
days unless someone steps up to maintain it. It appears to be utterly
broken, upstream is dead, and it is unmaintained within Gentoo.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122993
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Stra
On Friday 17 February 2006 07:38, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time.
>
> Taken from http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html:
> | "One thing is to frequently refer to "us" or "our". Pretend like people
> | are with you on this, so the
Jakub Moc wrote:
> OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time.
Taken from http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html:
| "One thing is to frequently refer to "us" or "our". Pretend like people are
| with you on this, so the uncertain ones will flock to your side!
|
| Code listing 1.6: Usa
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:14:39 +0100
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/DoNotFeedTroll.jpg
Err, what?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
17.2.2006, 0:42:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> (ommited)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/DoNotFeedTroll.jpg
Everyone else, sorry that you had to read this debate... :/
--
jakub
pgpDXBRuHXpDD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jakub Moc wrote: [Thu Feb 16 2006 - 06:34:32PM EST]
> 17.2.2006, 0:23:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | What are you talking about? commonbox is listed as maintainer of that
> > | stuff, it's been broken for years, you neith
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:34:32 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > You should probably go and read herds.xml sometime.
|
| Or maybe you should, rather...
I said to go and read herds.xml. I'm not going to bother carrying on
with this if you won't even do that properly.
--
Ciaran McCrees
17.2.2006, 0:23:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> |
> | What are you talking about? commonbox is listed as maintainer of that
> | stuff, it's been broken for years, you neither f
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically
| > | asked me to do it -
| > |
16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically asked
> | me to do it - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c11
> No, I asked you to do it properly, n
Jakub Moc wrote: [Thu Feb 16 2006, 03:32:13PM CST]
>
> 16.2.2006, 22:05:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
> > | removed from portage. There are tons of better
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically asked
| me to do it - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c11
No, I asked you to do it properly, not to send out one last rites email
for something you'
16.2.2006, 23:08:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:55:33 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >> wrote:
| >> | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| >
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:55:33 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| > | overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
> | overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201)
> It's not overdue. It hasn't had a proper last rites email sent out yet
> a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201)
It's not overdue. It hasn't had a proper last rites email sent out yet
and probably won't get one either, given the flamefest th
16.2.2006, 22:05:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
> | removed from portage. There are tons of better and working
> | alternatives.
> Uh, it's not a last rites unl
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
| removed from portage. There are tons of better and working
| alternatives.
Uh, it's not a last rites unless someone actually does the masking
pending removal.
app-editors/gnotepad+ is a simple HTML and text editor. It lacks a
maintainer, doesn't compile and last release upstream was 5+ years ago.
Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and removed from
portage. There are tons of better and working alternatives.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/
19 matches
Mail list logo
