Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/fig
On Thursday, February 26, 2015 19:22:16 Luis Ressel wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:13:14 -0600 Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org wrote: # Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org (21 Feb 2015) # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases app-emulation/fig Wouldn't a pkgmove be the better way to handle this? I thought about that and decided against it since the new versions are already released under the new name with a perfect discontinuity. The old versions don't have the new name while the new have both. Thus, with docker-compose always having newer versions than fig I figured the move would be unnecessary since the versions of fig don't translate to docker-compose while the new ones aren't released under fig. If this isn't correct, let me know how to do the move and I'll give it a shot. Otherwise, I think purging fig is the better move. Regards, -- Alex Brandt Cloud Evangelist for Rackspace and Developer for Gentoo http://blog.alunduil.com
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/fig
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: # Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org (21 Feb 2015) # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases app-emulation/fig Wouldn't a pkgmove be the better way to handle this? I was thinking the same thing. Cheers, Dirkjan
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/fig
# Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org (21 Feb 2015) # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases app-emulation/fig -- Alex Brandt Cloud Evangelist for Rackspace and Developer for Gentoo http://blog.alunduil.com
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/fig
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:13:14 -0600 Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org wrote: # Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org (21 Feb 2015) # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases app-emulation/fig Wouldn't a pkgmove be the better way to handle this? -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
