Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass

2022-12-28 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2022-12-26 10:11:18, Hans de Graaff wrote: > > It would be great if you could dust these off and post them here so we > can get these improvements merged. You mention in the bug that you'd > rather wait for a dedicated maintainer to review them, but I'm (in > name) that maintainer and I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass

2022-12-26 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 10:40 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > If anyone is interested, I posted updates/replacements for the other > two apache eclasses on https://bugs.gentoo.org/616612. Merging those > should ideally be accompanied by an update to apache-2.eclass, making > it use the paths

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass

2022-12-26 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 13:09 +0100, David Seifert wrote: > Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs > for > eclasses he maintained: > >   apache-2.eclass > > is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged > well. Given that this eclass is only used

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass

2022-12-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2022-12-25 13:09:46, David Seifert wrote: > Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs for > eclasses he maintained: > > apache-2.eclass > > is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged > well. If anyone is interested, I posted

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass

2022-12-25 Thread David Seifert
Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs for eclasses he maintained: apache-2.eclass is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged well. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part