Dnia 2015-04-13, o godz. 17:28:23
Gordon Pettey petteyg...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Erik Mackdanz erikm...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org writes:
git request-pull simply formats an email template to tell someone how
they may pull from
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Erik Mackdanz erikm...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org writes:
git request-pull simply formats an email template to tell someone how
they may pull from you, but Github makes no attempt to process such a
message or turn it into a Github pull
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org writes:
The only thing locked to their platform really is the web ui or their
api. Even pull requests really aren't, because git has the
git request-pull command.
Not true. Github pull requests are for pulling from other Github
repos/branches only, and they
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 03:03:18 + (UTC) Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
If travis will change their terms of service in future and our
workflow/infra will depends on these checks, whole development
process may be hampered.
Our infra has no dependency over travis. The only thing we've
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
we should not solely rely on third-party proprietary solutions
(travis is a github lock-in) because of convenience.
We must not.
//Peter
pgp10MsxnxXNc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 05:54:36PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Right now there is no hard dependency on github or travis, of
course. But present pathway worries me: with current pace at some
point we _will_ depend on travis or github too much. Then they may
change their terms of service or
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:57:13 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org
wrote:
While I must admit that travis is a quite convenient tool (thought
it has its limitations), I'd like to raise related software freedom
concern.
Travis
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
It may take some work, but I do not think we could reach a point
where nothing could be changed.
Remember that, unlike cvs, every git clone, by default, has all of the
history of the repository, so all we
Dnia 2015-04-12, o godz. 01:47:43
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:23:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, developers.
We have added a new mail alias travis-ci@g.o and set up travis-ci [1]
to send notifications on status change there. Please seriously
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:23:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, developers.
We have added a new mail alias travis-ci@g.o and set up travis-ci [1]
to send notifications on status change there. Please seriously consider
adding yourself to the alias, and
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org
wrote:
While I must admit that travis is a quite convenient tool (thought
it has its limitations), I'd like to raise related software freedom
concern.
Travis itself is a closed, proprietary and non-trivial-to-replace
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:23:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, developers.
We have added a new mail alias travis-ci@g.o and set up travis-ci [1]
to send notifications on status change there. Please seriously consider
adding yourself to the alias, and contributing to the quality
of Gentoo.
Hello, developers.
We have added a new mail alias travis-ci@g.o and set up travis-ci [1]
to send notifications on status change there. Please seriously consider
adding yourself to the alias, and contributing to the quality
of Gentoo.
The mail load is low -- travis will only send notices when the
13 matches
Mail list logo
