Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2019-01-27 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 20:16:28 CET Michał Górny wrote: > > It is a problem because any other package > > building QCH API docs with cross-references to Qt API needs to install > > below this path, and will generate the same QA warning (currently > > kde-frameworks/* does this). > > Yes. Tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-03 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 20:29 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 20:26:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than > > ${PF}? > > Because API does not change due to Gentoo revisions, and breaking/having to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-03 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 20:26:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than > ${PF}? Because API does not change due to Gentoo revisions, and breaking/having to rebuild docs for that is unacceptable. It will lead to more docs being

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-03 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/03/2018 12:38 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > > Until this QA check has adjustable whitelist support, we can consider it > an unstable work in progress. Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than ${PF}? If they don't need to be in ${PN}-${PV} in the first place, then th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-03 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2018 11:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/01/2018 11:16 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>> On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 17:48:16 CEST Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > /usr/share/doc l

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-02 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > Hi all, > > The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The > current whitelist includes: > > directories common to / and /usr > ===

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 13:48:46 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/01/2018 01:04 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 > > Zac Medico wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > >> of files outside of dire

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2018 01:04 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation >> of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The >> current whitelist include

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > Hi all, > > The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The > current whitelist includes: > > directories common to / and /usr > =

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2018 11:16 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 17:48:16 CEST Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: /usr/share/doc level directories ==

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 17:48:16 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > > > /usr/share/doc level directories > > > > > > /usr/share/doc/${PF} > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 17:48:16 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > > /usr/share/doc level directories > > > > /usr/share/doc/${PF} > > > > The first bug report [2] is for qt-core, which installs documentation > > i

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2018 08:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> I have created a patch that will allow ebuilds to whitelist directories >> by setting a QA_INSTALL_PATHS variable [3], however @mgorny said: > > @mgorny was seriously concerned about trigger-happy

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi all, > > The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The > current whitelist includes: > > directories common to / and /usr > ==

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:19 AM Zac Medico wrote: > > Hi all, > > The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The > current whitelist includes: > > directories common to / and /usr >

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

2018-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
Hi all, The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The current whitelist includes: directories common to / and /usr bin lib lib32 lib64 libx32 sbin top level directories