Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-02 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 02/11/19 08:54, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:59:35 + > Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > >> Thoughts from outside peanut gallery? >> >> Michael / veremitz. > I have an alternative that might be more pleasant: > > 1. Change repoman so that when its clear that: >- There

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:59:35 + Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > Thoughts from outside peanut gallery? > > Michael / veremitz. I have an alternative that might be more pleasant: 1. Change repoman so that when its clear that: - There is at least one ebuild being changed - There is

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:59:35 + Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > Hello, > > I've noticed a lot of stabilisation commit messages (and a few keywording > ones too) simply state the package atom and not the relevant > release/version. I find this a little meaningless, as unless this is the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 01/11/19 21:45, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:34 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt > wrote: >> On 01/11/19 21:11, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:36 PM Matt Turner wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:34 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > > git log --format=oneline glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild | grep stable > > > How well does git handle that when the ebuild is deleted from the tree? > git log --format=oneline -- glibc-2.29-r4.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:34 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 01/11/19 21:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:36 PM Matt Turner wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Therefore, it would be much /more/ useful to

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 01/11/19 21:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:36 PM Matt Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt >> wrote: >>> >>> Therefore, it would be much /more/ useful to have the package-version >>> tagged in the commit message, so that you could

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:36 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt > wrote: > > > > > > Therefore, it would be much /more/ useful to have the package-version > > tagged in the commit message, so that you could easily grep logs for when a > > given

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noticed a lot of stabilisation commit messages (and a few keywording > ones too) simply state the package atom and not the relevant > release/version. I find this a little meaningless, as unless this is the >

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
Hello, I've noticed a lot of stabilisation commit messages (and a few keywording ones too) simply state the package atom and not the relevant release/version. I find this a little meaningless, as unless this is the first time the package has ever been either stabilised or keyworded, it is