On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:36:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >>> What do you think about doing the following change in
>
On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> What do you think about doing the following change in
>>> /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
>>
>> The follow
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > What do you think about doing the following change in
> > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
>
> The following change has now landed in CVS:
I'd suggest a
On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> What do you think about doing the following change in
> /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
The following change has now landed in CVS:
Index: targets/developer/make.defaults
===
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:48:38 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> [1] I've seen developers complain more and more about failing test
> suites. Maybe that's a related issue? Developers now use the
> FEATURES set out in a developer profile and can then extract some
> kind of validity claim from the fact th
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:11:45 +0200
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> What do you think about doing the following change in
> /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
[..]
> What do you think?
I've never felt any need or obligation to use a developer profile. I
don't think I ever saw a
On 6/4/10 5:35 PM, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote:
> I've been thinking about this for a while. Some packages have tests
> that are meant only for upstream in certain conditions
> and are not meant to be ran during installing.
I think that in extreme cases src_test should not call such tests.
> A
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> What do you think about doing the following change in
> /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
>
> replace "test" with "test-fail-continue" to make it just less
> frustrating (we still have a lot of test failures)
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
replace "test" with "test-fail-continue" to make it just less
frustrating (we still have a lot of test failures)
Hopefully that will also make more of us use the developer profile, and
det
