On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:43:56 +0200 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > At the risk of reopening a large can of worms, can somebody explain
| > to me why the license groups idea won't run into the same conceptual
| > issues that derailed GLEP 29 (USE groups)? Am I missing something
| > obvi
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:43:56 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:50:01 -0500
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Marius Mauch wrote: [Thu Oct 26 2006, 12:02:59PM CDT]
> > > Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> > > (licese
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 21:43 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:50:01 -0500
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Marius Mauch wrote: [Thu Oct 26 2006, 12:02:59PM CDT]
> > > Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> > > (licese based visibility filt
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:50:01 -0500
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote: [Thu Oct 26 2006, 12:02:59PM CDT]
> > Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> > (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> > license groups came up,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:15:56 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> > (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> > license groups came up, in particular the way how they sh
Uhoh, forgive me for not reading the other replies before writing a
completely redundant one.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Marius Mauch wrote:
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be
> (technically) defined.
>
> The simplest way is a line based format
>
Marius Mauch wrote: [Thu Oct 26 2006, 12:02:59PM CDT]
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be
> (technically) defined.
>
> The simplest wa
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:40 +0200
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:02:36PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> > (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> > license groups c
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:02:36PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be
> (technically) defined.
>
> The sim
Marius Mauch wrote:
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be
> (technically) defined.
>
> The simplest way is a line based format
>
Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23
(licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of
license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be
(technically) defined.
The simplest way is a line based format
...
however this doesn't allow
12 matches
Mail list logo
