On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:43 +, Sven wrote:
> (1)
> All gems should be installed from ebuilds only.
>
> (2)
> If an ebuild requires a gem, it has to be installed from the corresponding
> ebuild. For all other gems, Gentoo leaves the choice to the user and tries to
> work together as well as po
> This can also be accomplish by a shared dependency package so is there a
> particular benefit for extending EAPI to support this?
If you look at it from a Gentoo-only perspecitve, there's probably no benefit.
But it would allow Gentoo to work together nicely with RubyGems.
So (apart from feasab
Sven wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue gentoo.org> writes:
so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of
package ?
>>> How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would
>>> this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds?
>> well given the next answer,
Sven posted loom.20090514t182756-...@post.gmane.org,
excerpted below, on Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 +:
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes:
>> FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, since it
>
> I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never min
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 + (UTC)
Sven wrote:
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes:
> > FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue,
> > since it
>
> I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never
> mind. Do you know where EAPI changes are discussed?
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes:
> FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, since it
I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never mind. Do you
know where EAPI changes are discussed? (Google and the Bugtracker didn't yield a
useful reply.)
Cheers, -
Sven posted loom.20090513t143352-...@post.gmane.org,
excerpted below, on Wed, 13 May 2009 14:34:20 +:
> Yet meanwhile I'd love to get some feedback on my original proposition:
> Is it feasable and acceptable to expand Portage by the possibility to
> declare a file shared between slots and on
Gilles Dartiguelongue gentoo.org> writes:
> > > so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of
> > > package ?
> > How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would
> > this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds?
>
> well given the next answer, it sounds
Le mardi 12 mai 2009 à 22:55 +0200, Sven Schwyn a écrit :
> Gilles wrote:
> > so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of
> > package ?
> How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would
> this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds?
well given the nex
Gilles wrote:
so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of
package ?
How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would
this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds?
If those kind of wrappers are generic enough, it could even be a
single
eselect package
Marijn wrote:
Is it feasable to extend Portage to allow a file to be owned by
several
slots and remove it only once the last slot is uninstalled (aka: once
the ebuild is completely uninstalled)?
Do we have any guarantees that the file you want to share will be
compatible
with all gems that
11 matches
Mail list logo
