Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-05 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: Peter Gordon wrote: Matthew Marlowe wrote: If we could get a license donated, my vote would be to switch to Atlassian Jira, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira. It seems to be gaining mindshare rather quickly, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-05 Thread Peter Gordon
Luis Francisco Araujo wrote: I think it is perfectly valid we use this kind of tools for development; as far as i know, our SC refers to those components (in form of software and metadata) to be free software upon which a user depend to build a Gentoo system, and this isn't one of those

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-05 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:32:50AM -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: However, I don't believe that Bugzilla is such a separate entity from the distribution as a whole. I, for one, would simply stop reporting bugs there if it was switched to a proprietary bug-tracking tool. Now, one could say that

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-04 Thread Peter Gordon
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: In the past, it's been more or less agreed that it's not depending upon it if it uses an open data format... There was talk of moving the forums to proprietary software at one point, for example. I see. Thanks for the clarification, Ciaran. (Though as an aside, I'd like

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-04 Thread Lance Albertson
Peter Gordon wrote: Matthew Marlowe wrote: If we could get a license donated, my vote would be to switch to Atlassian Jira, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira. It seems to be gaining mindshare rather quickly, and the company I work for just shelled out $2,400 because they liked it so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-04 Thread Matthew Marlowe
In the past, it's been more or less agreed that it's not depending upon it if it uses an open data format... There was talk of moving the forums to proprietary software at one point, for example. I see. Thanks for the clarification, Ciaran. (Though as an aside, I'd like to mention that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-04 Thread Jakub Moc
Matthew Marlowe wrote: 3) Free license and apparently even some free support and infrastructure management for open-source projects. Apparently, they donated one of the bug db's that the apache software foundation is using, for instance. Free as in - BitKeeper? :P Nah, no need to repeat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's Social Contract Bugzilla

2006-08-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:29:05 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Matthew Marlowe wrote: | 3) Free license and apparently even some free support and | infrastructure management for open-source projects. Apparently, | they donated one of the bug db's that the apache software | foundation