On 20-11-2017 11:53:32 -0600, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello friends!
>
> On Monday, November 20, 2017, Sergei Trofimovich <[1]sly...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:47:35 -0600
> > R0b0t1 <[2]r03...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Understanding an existing codebase should not be a technical
> >>
R0b0t1 writes:
> This is why I am surprised documentation is lacking for specific
> projects, or, I suppose, any software package that has ever been
> created.
No surprise. There is always a gap between theory and practice.
That said, I will prioritize myself to document the internals of Gen
Hello friends!
On Monday, November 20, 2017, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:47:35 -0600
> R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> Understanding an existing codebase should not be a technical
>> challenge. I had to resort to reimplementing all of the steps myself,
>> in part to understand if they
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:47:35 -0600
R0b0t1 wrote:
> Understanding an existing codebase should not be a technical
> challenge. I had to resort to reimplementing all of the steps myself,
> in part to understand if they were done properly in the first place.
Looks like you are an expert in this area
Hello friends!
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Benda Xu wrote:
> Greetings R0b0t1,
>
> R0b0t1 writes:
>
>> It is one thing to say that contributions to the main Portage tree
>> require some standards to be upheld, but these standards do not seem
>> to be applied consistently. For example, cross
