Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-27 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 24/04/2010 19:40, Petteri Räty a écrit : What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent stuff too. More bureaucracy and policies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-26 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote: snip Use common sense here. ^^ Seems pretty clear to me.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Alistair Bush
On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.04.24 18:40, Petteri Räty wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an example there 17:37 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: Ok so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 04/26/2010 01:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-25 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25-04-2010 13:10, Petteri Räty wrote: On 04/26/2010 01:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how

[gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Petteri Räty
17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an example there 17:37 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks. What do you think about not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 24 April 2010 23:10, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an example there 17:37 Betelgeuse

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

2010-04-24 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: 17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? 17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an example there 17:37