Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line

2015-08-31 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 08/31/2015 01:33 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Alec Warner wrote: >>> >>> Mostly, because when I see "A version is bumped" I immediately expect >>> to know which version the bump is to, but have to dig out the diff to >>> find out. >>> >> >> So I thought we used to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

2015-08-31 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Alec Warner wrote: >> >> Mostly, because when I see "A version is bumped" I immediately expect >> to know which version the bump is to, but have to dig out the diff to >> find out. >> > > So I thought we used to have scripts that would dig out this information and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

2015-08-31 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn: > > adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive > > enough to see what went on while scann

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line

2015-08-11 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/08/15 10:35 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: >> Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', >> 'cat/pn: adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough >> yet descriptive eno

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line

2015-08-11 Thread Mikle Kolyada
11.08.2015 17:36, hasufell пишет: > On 08/11/2015 04:28 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 11/08/15 04:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >>> The more we stuff into the summary line, the harder it will be to >>> write meaningful summaries. And thus, people will write crappy ones >>> or ignore the len

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line

2015-08-11 Thread hasufell
On 08/11/2015 04:28 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 11/08/15 04:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >> The more we stuff into the summary line, the harder it will be to >> write meaningful summaries. And thus, people will write crappy ones >> or ignore the length limit. I recommend against any more >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

2015-08-11 Thread Kent Fredric
On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn: > adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive > enough to see what went on while scanning the log. I personally find those summaries a bit too terse

[gentoo-dev] Summary line (was: Re: Referencing bug reports in git)

2015-08-11 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/08/15 04:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > The more we stuff into the summary line, the harder it will be to > write meaningful summaries. And thus, people will write crappy ones > or ignore the length limit. I recommend against any more > pre