On Friday 16 February 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote:
OK, I did not understand how it was supposed to work. Is there
documentation anywhere that explains how it works and why?
other than the comment in /etc/conf.d/clock, nope ... the init script will
warn you at boot if you still havent set it
I think the easiest approach then would be to have an /etc/timezone
directory that should have a single file in it with the current
timezone. This file could be copied from /usr and keep the original
name. example:
/etc/timezone/MST7MDT
Pretty easy to understand and deal with. What do you
Um, alternatively you could just copy /usr/share/zoneinfo/foo to
/etc/localtime rather than having a symlink. Since the zoneinfo file
has the name of the timezone in it already, it is probably not
necessary to preserve the filename of the timezone file.
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Daniel Robbins [EMAIL
Well, sure, but the timezone-data ebuild could be upgraded to check to
see if /etc/localtime is old or not and inform the user or even take
appropriate steps to automatically fix this (dangerous?)
This may not be possible with a direct copy to /etc/localtime, but it
should work with the
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:47:10 -0700 Daniel Robbins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Well, sure, but the timezone-data ebuild could be upgraded to check to
| see if /etc/localtime is old or not and inform the user or even take
| appropriate steps to automatically fix this (dangerous?)
Not doable with a
On Friday 16 February 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote:
Well, sure, but the timezone-data ebuild could be upgraded to check to
see if /etc/localtime is old or not and inform the user or even take
appropriate steps to automatically fix this (dangerous?)
as Ciaran said, this is plain not doable
the
OK, I did not understand how it was supposed to work. Is there
documentation anywhere that explains how it works and why?
-Daniel
On 2/16/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote:
Well, sure, but the timezone-data ebuild could be upgraded to
I see a timezone variable was added. good idea! how is it implemented
exactly? seeing as I have a symlink in /etc/localtime what will this
change if I set it?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:11, Caleb Cushing wrote:
I see a timezone variable was added. good idea! how is it implemented
exactly? seeing as I have a symlink in /etc/localtime what will this
change if I set it?
AFAIK it currently does nothing and will be used in the future.
--
Raymond
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:16:18 +1030
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:11, Caleb Cushing wrote:
I see a timezone variable was added. good idea! how is it
implemented exactly? seeing as I have a symlink in /etc/localtime
what will this change if I
which most probably aren't since that was changed in the handbook
(wonders why it was).
On 2/15/07, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:16:18 +1030
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:11, Caleb Cushing wrote:
I see a
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:01:11AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
which most probably aren't since that was changed in the handbook
(wonders why it was).
It might have something to do with the fact that FHS specifies that /usr
does not have to be on the root partition and thus using a symlink in
never thought of that. thx for the info.
On 2/15/07, Anders Bruun Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:01:11AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
which most probably aren't since that was changed in the handbook
(wonders why it was).
It might have something to do with the fact
13 matches
Mail list logo