Re: [gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-12-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 16 October 2008 03:27:29 Duft Markus wrote: > Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex. > It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though > about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and > dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same fo

RE: [gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Duft Markus
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Duft Markus wrote: > > Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex. > > It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I > though > > about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and > > dev-libs/bison-runt

Re: [gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Duft Markus wrote: > Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex. > It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though > about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and > dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the sa

Re: [gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-10-2008 09:27:29 +0200, Duft Markus wrote: > Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex. > It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though > about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and > dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same for flex)

[gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Duft Markus
Hi there! I'm working on a "cross" compilation to native windows from an Interix Gentoo Prefix, using the normal Prefix portage tree. My setup is nearly the same as when really cross compiling, except that I can execute what I compile. I use command line utilities (DEPEND atoms) from Interix, and