On 10/29/10 11:33 AM, James Rowe wrote:
> * "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>> I'm curious: do you have some more ebuilds using v8? It'd be great to
>> add them to the portage tree at some point, if possible. Or maybe
>> sunrise overlay...
>
> We took the easy way out and chos
* "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> I'm curious: do you have some more ebuilds using v8? It'd be great to
> add them to the portage tree at some point, if possible. Or maybe
> sunrise overlay...
We took the easy way out and chose Debian because v8/nodejs were
packaged when we
On 10/27/10 8:59 PM, James Rowe wrote:
> * "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>> There is one issue that keeps dev-lang/v8 in hard mask and prevents its
>> broader usage (I think www-client/chromium could start using it).
>
> Thanks for working on this. I use v8 quite a bit, and
* "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> There is one issue that keeps dev-lang/v8 in hard mask and prevents its
> broader usage (I think www-client/chromium could start using it).
Thanks for working on this. I use v8 quite a bit, and being able to
simply depend on the ebuilds wou
There is one issue that keeps dev-lang/v8 in hard mask and prevents its
broader usage (I think www-client/chromium could start using it). I hope
you'll help me find the best solution.
Some context first. Upstream does not promise any binary compatibility
between releases, so each version has a dif
