Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:25:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using

[gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Doug Goldstein
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but sometimes users have patches which touch autoconf files but my existing patch set doesn't so I'm not

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 24 April 2012 09:15, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but sometimes users have patches

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but sometimes users have

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but sometimes users have patches which touch

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0400 Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:18:59 Michał Górny wrote: It's simply better just to assume: if user wants user patches, he/she needs to have necessary deps installed. if the package doesn't ever run autotools itself, i think this assumption is fine. set AUTOTOOLS_AUTO_DEPEND=no before inherting

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily