On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:29:51 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > src_compile() {
> > { sleep 10 ; has_version '>=app-misc/foo-1.23' ; } &
> > }
>
> is & allowed in ebuilds? should?
Banning it entirely is excessive. Banning leaving any attached
processes
Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:50:56 -0800
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends on the implementation; for pkgcore, if that comm pipe is
dead, the ebuild env *should* be dead, or dieing. Background'ing
processes from that env isn't valid imo,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:50:56 -0800
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Depends on the implementation; for pkgcore, if that comm pipe is
>> dead, the ebuild env *should* be dead, or dieing. Background'ing
>> processes from that env isn't valid imo, either.
>
> R
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:50:56 -0800
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends on the implementation; for pkgcore, if that comm pipe is
> dead, the ebuild env *should* be dead, or dieing. Background'ing
> processes from that env isn't valid imo, either.
Right. Paludis will give a weird di
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:28:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:16 -0800
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
> > > parallel? Is it legal f
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:16 -0800
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
> > parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends
> > after the ebuild process has
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:03:21 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> > Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
> > parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends
> > after the ebuild process has terminated? Discuss.
> >
>
On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
> it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
> process has terminated? Discuss.
If the pm implements read/write locking on the underlying dat
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
> it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
> process has terminated? Discuss.
>
Do you/anybody know if they are used in parallel in the tree at the moment?
Regards,
P
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
process has terminated? Discuss.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
10 matches
Mail list logo
