Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 10/30/11 23:33, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for >> keeping these before i punt them ? >> -mike >> > > Breaking overlays. grepping

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:17:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: > > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reaso

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for > > keeping these before i punt them ? > > Breaking overlays. Isn

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/31/2011 12:37 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >>> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason >>> for keeping these before i

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason >> for keeping these before i pun

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Petteri Räty
On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for > keeping these before i punt them ? > -mike > Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break backwards comp

[gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for keeping these before i punt them ? -mike