On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM, hasufell wrote:
> But people should expect that things work somehow in the tree, even on
> ~arch. Even worse: the stable googleearth builds are unfetchable and
> that's not how I'd define any stable ebuild in the tree.
You'll get no argument from me on any of that
On 07/21/2013 07:42 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> I am maintaining it for some months now and it has reached a state
>> where we should think about treecleaning it.
>
> ++
>
>> Maintaining a package in gentoo implies a few things for me:
>> We are
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, hasufell wrote:
> I am maintaining it for some months now and it has reached a state
> where we should think about treecleaning it.
++
> Maintaining a package in gentoo implies a few things for me:
> We are able to support it properly which either means that we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am maintaining it for some months now and it has reached a state
where we should think about treecleaning it.
reasons:
a) bundles tons of libs since ages (security and stability issues,
many of them can not be unbundled)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show
