On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 3:56 PM Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:32 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> >
>> > So, considering all the feedback from mailing list and IRC:
>> >
>> >/usr/portage ->
On 29/07/18 21:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>
> Why not stick the repos in /var/repos and not /var/db/repos? If we're
> just making up paths, why not make up a shorter one? I don't think
> any other linux distros use /var/db...
>
*BSD I believe ..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 3:56 PM Matt Turner wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:32 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >
> > So, considering all the feedback from mailing list and IRC:
> >
> >/usr/portage -> /var/db/repos/gentoo
> >/usr/portage/distfiles ->
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:32 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>
>>> Users must never need to modify files in /var/lib to configure a
>>> package's operation, and _the_specific_file_hierarchy_ used to
>>> store the data _must_not_be_
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 27 lipca 2018 10:32:17 CEST, Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>>
Users must never need to modify files in /var/lib to configure a
package's operation, and
[Proxying a message from Anders Thomson ]
Hi Ulrich,
As non-devs aren't allowed to post to gentoo-dev, I was hoping that you would
proxy this question/comment for me.
While on the subject of changing defaults, could we consider changing the
(default) location of the pkg db? Roughly everything in
W dniu pią, 27.07.2018 o godzinie 08∶06 -0700, użytkownik Brian Dolbec
napisał:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:31:15 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> > > July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs"
> > > wrote:
> > > > Section 5.5.2
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:31:15 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
>
> > July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs"
> > wrote:
>
> >> Section 5.5.2 describes the directory structure of /var/cache.
> >> These paths are all optional [1].
> >>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs" wrote:
>> Section 5.5.2 describes the directory structure of /var/cache.
>> These paths are all optional [1].
>>
>> /var/cache/fonts
>> /var/cache/man
>> /var/cache/www
>> /var/cache/
>>
>>
July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> So, considering all the feedback from mailing list and IRC:
>>
>> /usr/portage -> /var/db/repos/gentoo
>> /usr/portage/distfiles -> /var/cache{,/gentoo}/distfiles
>>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So, considering all the feedback from mailing list and IRC:
>
>/usr/portage -> /var/db/repos/gentoo
>/usr/portage/distfiles -> /var/cache{,/gentoo}/distfiles
>/usr/portage/packages ->
Dnia 27 lipca 2018 10:32:17 CEST, Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>
>>> Users must never need to modify files in /var/lib to configure a
>>> package's operation, and _the_specific_file_hierarchy_ used to
>>> store the data _must_not_be_
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> Users must never need to modify files in /var/lib to configure a
>> package's operation, and _the_specific_file_hierarchy_ used to
>> store the data _must_not_be_ _exposed_ to regular users."
> One small note, while it is never
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
Users must never
need to modify files in /var/lib to configure a package's operation,
and _the_specific_file_hierarchy_ used to store the data _must_not_be_
_exposed_ to regular users."
One small note, while it is never needed to modify, skel.ebuild would then be
a
On July 18, 2018 2:55:55 AM PDT, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>It was mentioned that all three directories (ebuild repository, binary
>packages, distfiles) have some characteristics of a cache. However, I
>think this is much more true for distfiles than for the other two,
>which cannot be easily
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:55 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> Also, there is that strange requirement that the
> >> file hierarchy must not be exposed to users. At least for the
> >>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:55 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Also, there is that strange requirement that the
>> file hierarchy must not be exposed to users. At least for the
>> make.profile link we rely on a well defined hierarchy, and certainly
>>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:55 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> "Pertains to one specific host" doesn't seem to apply to the Gentoo
> repository though.
Sure it does. The state of the package repository on a Gentoo host
doesn't affect any other host.
Sure, that state is synced from someplace that
On 07/18/2018 11:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I therefore suggest the following scheme:
The full scheme looks good to me
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description:
[Moving the thread back from -project to -dev.]
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Well, /var/lib/ is 3 right there. If 5 is no good then you
>> only have one left. We could just make it /var/lib/repos which seems
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo
