Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Monday 07 of May 2012 10:32:45 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 05/07/2012 02:24 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Therefore I suggest we move this example a bit down in skel.ebuild > as it's more logical to continue with new lines instead of applying > in-between > > Any objectio

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/07/2012 02:24 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Therefore I suggest we move this example a bit down in skel.ebuild as it's more logical to continue with new lines instead of applying in-between Any objections? Yes. Please leave it as it is. Yeah, I will if someone has a (good) argument for

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 06 May 2012 17:56:41 Michael Sterrett wrote: > I prefer it right after IUSE which is where it currently is in skel.ebuild. this -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Montag 07 Mai 2012, 01:24:39 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or > >> XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it before DEP

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or >> XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it before DEPEND >> and RDEPEND. > I would rather see RESTRICT dropped from

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: > If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically > include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Michael Sterrett
I prefer it right after IUSE which is where it currently is in skel.ebuild.

[gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Therefore I suggest we move this example a bit down in skel.ebuild as it's more logical to continue with new lines instead of applying in-between Any objections? --- skel