On 01/28/2012 10:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
along these lines, why is cdrtools set*
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom"
> >>>
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> This is definitely not an improvement and should be reverted. The
>> suid root is also needed to elevate cdrecord's scheduling priority.
> Missed that piece of code and reverted then. Any chance you could be
> more specific?
cdrecord calls mlo
On 01/28/2012 08:28 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
i've improved the situation _a bit_:
+*cdrtools-3.01_alpha06-r1 (28 Jan 2012)
+
+ 28 Jan 2012; Samuli Suominen
+ +cdrtools-3.01_alpha06-r1.ebuild:
+ Change cdda2wav, cdrecord, readcd and rscsi from
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> i've improved the situation _a bit_:
> +*cdrtools-3.01_alpha06-r1 (28 Jan 2012)
> +
> + 28 Jan 2012; Samuli Suominen
> + +cdrtools-3.01_alpha06-r1.ebuild:
> + Change cdda2wav, cdrecord, readcd and rscsi from suid root to sgid
> disk for
> +
On Friday 27 January 2012 20:49:49 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> and people have multiple times tried to convince the cdrtools author to
> change this, but without success.
> the author can be, well, ...
sure, i'm not expecting him to be anything resembling reasonable. but if we
can reduce set*id imp
On Friday 27 January 2012 20:28:04 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> > along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" group,
> > and we assign our cdroms/dvdroms to that group, then we already have
> > access control in place and can skip the set*id.
On 01/28/2012 03:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2012 20:07:45 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
along these lines, why is cdrtools set*
On Friday 27 January 2012 20:07:45 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom"
> >>> gr
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" group, and
> we assign our cdroms/dvdroms to that group, then we already have access
> control in place and can skip the set*id.
> -mike
>From the manpage, "In order to be able to use the SCSI transport
su
On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" group,
and we assign our cdroms/dvdroms to that group, then we already have
acc
On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" group,
> > and we assign our cdroms/dvdroms to that group, then we already have
> > access control in place and can skip th
On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
hmm, i wonder why mount.nfs is set*id. if we require everyone to use `mount`,
there's no need for `mount.nfs` to be set*id. someone want to point out
something obvious that i'm missing before i adjust the nfs-utils package ?
along these lines, why
hmm, i wonder why mount.nfs is set*id. if we require everyone to use `mount`,
there's no need for `mount.nfs` to be set*id. someone want to point out
something obvious that i'm missing before i adjust the nfs-utils package ?
along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" gro
14 matches
Mail list logo
